Skip to main content
Out of Texas and Into Africa

I have just been listening to a speech of quite nauseating hypocrisy from George W. Bush at the start of his visit to Senegal. This was from the President of a country, which not so long ago saw 10% of the black population of a small Texan town jailed on the word of a single corrupt police officer, a case that was drawn to the attention of one Governor George Bush, who did, absolutely nothing and allowed the innocent languish in jail, until, I’m pleased to say that they were all released this year when all the convictions were overturned thanks to the efforts of civil rights activists.



Two things really irk me about the Bush speech. Firstly, the staged apologism at the site of one of Africa’s ancient slave markets and secondly, the hypocrisy, as many of Africa’s poverty problems stem directly from American and European protectionism.

Let’s not forget that like it or not, Africa was a willing partner in the Slave trade and in some parts of the continent it continues today, despite all efforts to stamp it out. This doesn’t mitigate the extent of the crime against millions of innocent victims over three hundred years but the slavers depended on staging points in West Africa and Zanzibar, which I once visited, because they couldn’t venture inland, threatened by disease and malaria. Subsequently, millions of Africans were delivered to the slave auctions by corrupt local rulers, who grew very rich as a result.

Whole societies were wiped out by the demands of the trade and Africa was almost depopulated as a consequence of greed on the part of white man and black man alike. There must come a time however, when we move forward and stop apologising for the crimes of the past as if we were uniquely respopnsible. The Arabs don't even bother and for several hundred years before the slave trade in America started, the trade via Oman flourished.

Africa must be allowed to stand on its own feet and accept responsibility for itself and be given the opportunity to compete in the first world market that is closed to it or in other words protecting American and European farmers at the expense of African children. Competition however is meaningless unless the endemic corruption of African leaders is stamped out. Mugabe wouldn’t be tolerated anywhere else but political correctness prevails and we are prepared to sacrifice a once prosperous country like Zimbabwe because we fear the accusations of colonialism.

Bush will come and go, he’ll attract votes at home and Africa will continue to suffer because no western nation really wants to become involved in a continent which offers no solutions and only poverty, misery, ethnic warfare and corruption to show for thirty years of aid and good intentions. Africa, I suspect, has too little no oil and too many problems to really attract the interest of Mr Bush and if the political stability of both Sao Tome and Nigeria, which both happen to sit on large oil-fields wasn't an issue, I wonder if he would be there at all?.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…