Skip to main content
Opting for a Sensible Option.

This month’s ‘Spam Summit’ held by the All Party Internet Group at Westminster, didn’t leave its audience too much in the way of optimism for the future.

We all know spam is a menace but even with better filtering from the Internet Service Providers and stronger legislation from Europe and the United States, it’s unlikely that the efforts at remediation are going to make a great difference before the Internet starts grinding to a halt under the weight of unsolicited email.

As Steve Linford of Spamhaus tells us, 90% of the unsolicited email we receive, Spam, comes from 140 ‘Spammers’ and to qualify as a member of Spamhaus’ hall of fame, its ‘ROXO’ list, then a spammer has to have been thrown off three consecutive ISPs. The Spamhaus Block List (SBL) has 140 million users but although it’s proactive and pre-emptive by blocking known IP addresses, it’s useless against open relays and proxies and the worst offenders on ROXO are sending out as many as 50 million emails a day. It’s a big business and increasingly one which attracts racketeering and the Mafia on its seedier pornographic side and an exploding ‘service’ sector in China, where ISPs are happy to accommodate Spam operations for a few hundred dollars a month.

AOL is apparently the best place to be if you wish to avoid Spam. It blocks 2 billion emails each day to its 26 million customers but the company, like every other ISP and service, such as Microsoft’s Hotmail, is in a technology arms race with the spammers who are constantly searching for new ways to bypass their filtering systems.

Both the United States and the Europe legislating against the concealment of identity or in other words sending ‘spoofed’ headers, as one way of clearly criminalising aspects of the activity. Presently, as much as 66% of all the Spam received is deceptive in its header or subject line and as a consequence violates the laws of twelve US States. The only problem is that enforcement is relatively unheard of and only 2% of unsolicited email has the magic ‘ADV’ label which US laws require.

So what can be done? Clearly, the European Commission is clamping down and new EU rules on unsolicited email, requiring a strict ‘opt-in’ and an existing customer relationship, will become law in October, which at first sight sounds great until of course you realise that most of the unsolicited mail, more than 90% comes from outside the European Union.

The Americans, bless them, have more than thirty state laws and a constitution that guarantees freedom of speech and the right to shoot bears. Unlike Europe, America doesn’t view information privacy as a fundamental right and the Direct Marketing Association, rather like the National Rifle Association, believes that the right of free expression should be supported, whatever the consequences.

The Republican administration under George W.B. looks set to pass ‘opt-out’ legislation, rather than ‘opt’-in legislation. This would be a complete disaster for everyone for three reasons. Firstly because you would then have to opt-out of any unsolicited email you may be sent, secondly because 23 million small US businesses would be free to hit anyone with an Internet address and thirdly, because the Chinese government is more likely to follow the Americans than the European in framing its own legislation. Therefore, the spammers will become very rich and the Internet, where already 50% of the traffic is unsolicited email, will slowly grind to a creaking halt under the weight of freedom of expression.

Ultimately and if a solution is not found quickly, I can see the appearance of two Internets. The free one, which resembles the space inside my front door, after I return from holiday, crammed with credit card offers and a private ‘Walled Garden’, where business pays for its email in a relatively spam free environment. Either way, the Internet looks set to become a channel of diminishing returns for the rest of us unless Uncle Sam and the European Commission start singing from the same hymn sheet, which is about as likely as an agreement on the whereabouts of those elusive weapons of mass destruction.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …