Skip to main content
Hidden in Plain Sight

It came as a blinding flash of inspiration at a round table on security I was attending a stone’s throw from Tony’s place. All the right people were there. Police, Government, Banks and ISPs, all worrying our way through the problems of being an Internet society.



The suggestion when it came appeared from a source one would least expect. “Shouldn’t encryption be automatic”? After all, it would be more difficult to commit an electronic crime if this were the case.

In a society where both Police and Government are more than a little paranoid about strong encryption, the idea that data should be automatically encrypted in order to protect it comes as a surprise. Encryption is more frequently used to transmit data rather than store data and the problem we have with most sensitive financial and personal information is that it is readily available to anyone who is prepared to hack into the system that holds it. Take health records in our new and expensively wired NHS as an example. Shouldn’t such records be encrypted and shouldn’t any business or agency holding personal or financial data be expected, by law, if necessary to encrypt that information as a data protection measure?

One comment from the direction of Whitehall suggested that there was “A pressing need for data protection legislation to be updated to meet the needs of the 20th century” and a concession that matters were not entirely going to plan where the subjects of Internet security, authentication and identity were involved.

So there you have it, a dozen of the most influential people from both government and the private sector, appear to agree that we need to reconsider the encryption argument, from being a security problem to a security benefit which might even be embedded in future legislation.

Do you think that your NHS records and any other personal or financial details held on you should be encrypted as a matter of routine by the business or agency that holds them? Let me know.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …