Skip to main content
Men in Tights

Two recent statements by the Prime Minister finally convinced me that our government is at odds with reality. The first of these, only last week when Mr Blair mocked the office of The Lord Chancellor, describing the most senior judge as a man dressed in woman’s tights, while the second, a little closer to home, showed little understanding of the true condition of the domestic IT industry:



Responding to a question from Conservative backbencher, Andrew Selous, concerning unemployment in the IT sector, The Prime Minister answered:

"I simply point out to the Honourable. Gentleman that in his constituency, as in others, unemployment has fallen dramatically over the past few years and there are increasing employment opportunities for people in IT and other sectors as well”.

Last year, I wrote in ‘Thought for The Day’, that the recession in the IT industry was largely invisible to government, because the self-employed professional rarely if ever, ‘signs-on’ until he or she is quite destitute. In twelve months, nobody I know has claimed the job-seekers allowance, although I’m glad to say that most have now found work. Perhaps not the work they would have liked but it takes approximately six months, in my experience for someone to find regular work in this industry, once they have been axed and beyond this point, the chances of finding employment become increasingly harder from what I’m told.

Government’s answer is to grant 200,000 work permits a year, up from 40,000 the previous year and making it even harder for UK citizens to compete on an equal basis in their own, very oversubscribed market.

Mr Blair argues, "Those who get work permits are specifically audited for their ability to get work in this country - people want them to work for them - and I do not think that it is right to set those people against those who are looking for work”.

So where are those 200,000 ‘guest workers’ going? Many will find work in highly specialised roles, like Cisco-trained engineers but I’m prepared to guess that the greater proportion will, as recent stories in Computer Weekly have revealed, go into some very large unnamed companies through the front door, while the more expensive or should I say ‘uncompetitive’ domestic contractor workforce leaves through the rear.

Perhaps I’m wrong but in my view, government clearly does not have an accurate picture of unemployment in the IT sector and its causal forces. In his book ‘The New Barbarian Manifesto’, Professor Ian Angell of the London School of Economics, warns of exactly the consequences that we see around us today. I suspect that few people in government have read it. If they had, we might see a more enlightened policy towards the protection of our rather shaky IT sector.

So while government abolishes the rights of men to wear tights, the economic truths of our domestic IT market appear to be hidden behind a veil of misleading unemployment statistics. Until government is able to demonstrate a real understanding of both the importance of tights and the problems facing this important sector of the economy, I find it hard to express real confidence in its programme of development and reform. Is this unkind or do you share my views?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …