Skip to main content
Spam Another Day

It’s getting worse. Spam that is. The number of junk mail messages I’m receiving on a daily basis has almost doubled since I last wrote about the problem. In fact, Brightmail estimate that the problem has increased by as much as 400% in the last year at a global cost to business of £5.5 billion or marginally more than the cost to the taxpayer of a successful bid to host the 2012 Olympics.



I recently discovered to my cost, that having one’s email address on a company website is a very bad idea. There’s a whole industry devoted to ‘harvesting’ addresses from the Web and one piece of research has demonstrated that six decoy email addresses attracted 8,500 pieces of spam in six months alone; much of which, appears to come from Africans asking if they can borrow one’s bank account.

The Americans, now ratcheting-up their own legislation are at last even considering an anti-spam treaty, although I rather wonder how effective this might be. Both AOL and Microsoft are pushing for much harsher penalties for marketing companies that breach existing legislation.

In the United States, The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has witnessed an explosion in the number of complaints it receives from consumers about spam. In 2001, around 10,000 junk e-mails each day, were being forwarded to its staff from unhappy Internet users. This figure now stands closer to 130,000and such is the frustration at being unable to prevent the seemingly inexhaustible growth in illicit direct email that even the most moderate voices in Government are starting to suggest penalties that are only a little less removed from a government-sponsored vacation to Guantanamo Bay.

Lat week, I received advanced notification of the UK’s first ‘Spam Summit’, which illustrates the concern our own MPs, led by Labour’s Derek Wyatt. I don’t however believe that even with our string European legislation, we can do much more against this menace, short of rigorously filtering every piece of email that comes into the country, an idea that Home Secretary, David Blunkett has tried to introduce by another route.

Other than talking about the problem and imposing harsh penalties on European and American companies that choose to ignore the legislation, I’m not sure what we can actually do to shut down the forty or so major businesses that hide in the Far East. It’s rather like saying that we are outraged by the trade in endangered species for inclusion in traditional oriental medicine. We can be as outraged as we like but that’s not going to stop a highly lucrative business succeeding in a legislative environment which turns a blind eye on international treaties.

So we have a choice. We insist that ISPs install anti-spam filters, which many, if most of them are doing and on our own mail servers and PCs we install software like ‘V@anquish’ a product that I’ve just been sent from the States, that sounds like a washing powder but promises “A radical approach” to the problem. We’ll see.

Short of sending the sixth fleet along to bomb the offenders, possibly the most appealing solution for most of our readers, all we can do is hope that tighter legislation in Europe and the United States will reduce some of the background noise and remove the likes of the mail I received earlier from GenerateMoreVisitors052203@excite.com that asks:

“Would you like to have your message seen by over 15.6 million opt-in targeted people daily”?

Opting-in to an email list is rather like opting-in to taxation. There’s no way to opt-out out from either.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…