Skip to main content
Pots and Black Kettles

You may recall how Computer Weekly reported how, Government had warned the IT industry that "lies" and "exorbitant and unsubstantiated claims" by suppliers are jeopardising the future of public-private partnerships,

It was Peter Gershon, Chief Executive of the Office of Government Commerce, who told vendors to "get their act together" and recognise the need to deliver success and value for money, adding "There is little evidence that the IT industry has an understanding of what is needed to make these partnerships work,"

“Every day”, complained Mr Gershon, "I'm faced by suppliers who make exorbitant and unsubstantiated claims” and he was joined by the e-Envoy Andrew Pinder, who argued , "some projects have failed because suppliers have lied about their capability and promised things they cannot deliver”.

Andrew Pinder

Government appears then, to be suggesting that the IT industry is selling ‘snake oil’ and that when large public sector projects fail or run wildly over budget, which of course 50% of them do, any blame should lie squarely at the feet of IT and not with a long tradition of failure among senior management in many central government departments.

When one mixes the unprincipled and the allegedly incompetent, then the results are not totally unexpected. However, it is not just suppliers who have “promised things they cannot deliver”.

I have pulled out four Government headlines from the last month and I will let you judge whether these are in any way fanciful or exaggerated?

- This Government will meet its target to have all public services online by 2005
- The NHS is a perfect example of how the government is modernising public services and using new technology to find challenging new solutions to meet the needs of the British public
- The Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND) is looking to reduce the intake of asylum seekers via facial recognition systems.
- Whitehall will soon be able to secure online communications and transactions between government agencies

All four involve IT but does anyone really believe that these statements are true? Perhaps the last one, involving secure communications, might be, if only because ‘soon’ can mean anything.

The reality is that Government is depending on IT to deliver the reforms that the public sector so badly needs but the problem, is that Government is as guilty of exaggeration as any of its technology partners. Government has mandated that a number of steps will have been completed by 2005 but it can’t be sure that the technology it is buying into will guarantee the success it requires for political purposes. As a result, everyone starts making ‘promises’ and these targets become ‘aspirational’, while you and I sit there wondering how anyone in Government can keep a straight face when accusing others of making “exorbitant and unsubstantiated claims”.

Surely, it’s what Government in this country does best?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…