Skip to main content
A Politically Incorrect View of Outsourcing

I am beginning to wonder when the BNP will add IT outsourcing to its list of manifesto promises.

New Labour has never been a real friend to the domestic IT industry, preferring to seek the company of the handful of American giants than support the efforts of the thousands of small companies and contractors that take the lumps of tin and the expensive code and turn them into the systems that UK business relies upon.

First of course, there was IR45 and then last month, the Inland Revenue decided to interpret an unknown piece of eighties legislation to the disadvantage of husband and wife companies in both the entertainment and the IT industries. Roughly speaking it says that if the husband does the IT work and the wife does the accounts and all the important other stuff, then she is not an equal partner in the company and should be taxed differently. This is of course quite contrary to the divorce legislation and quite possibly sexist too.

I will not go into the details but I am sure you can guess what the implications are. It is hard enough for the small companies I know in IT to make money and the Treasury appears hell-bent on squeezing the survivors of the present recession out of business.

People feel strongly about such things and it’s not just unfair treatment and taxation. Outsourcing as a topic of conversation among IT professionals is becoming almost as emotive as immigration and invariably, the two subjects collide, as happened this weekend at a party I attended at the home of one of the UK’s wealthiest IT executives.

Computer Weekly has already reported this week that the National Audit Office is to examine complaints surrounding the IT work permit scheme and the only surprise to me is how long it has taken them to realise that there was a problem.

At a time when unemployment among the domestic IT workforces is at record levels, there are numerous complaints that employers are breaching work permit regulations by replacing British IT workers with lower-cost Indian contractors who do not qualify for pensions or National Insurance contributions. Are you surprised? Of course you aren’t.

Our Government is issuing record numbers of work permits to overseas IT staff and it was only a year ago that one of the largest of the foreign contracting companies invited me to a meeting in London to see if I might be of help to them in developing their presence in the public sector. What surprised me in that meeting me were the names of the company’s alleged ‘friends’ in government and their level of authority.

If I’m honest, I would say that we will continue to outsource our domestic industry into partial oblivion unless someone takes a strong hand and starts asking questions. Not so long ago, one MP said to me something along the lines of:

Listen, my constituency has several powerful and well organised lobbies with an interest in the Indian subcontinent. If they want me to talk about Kashmir or work permits or Indian IT, I do as I’m asked because if I don’t, then I won’t be around for the next election”.

So there you have it, whether you wish to believe me or not. A politically incorrect assessment of the problem. Our own IT workforce is threatened by a much larger and well-organised agenda, which is invisible to the ordinary contractor and is really about another country’s national interests and the influence it wields both politically and financially where it counts most.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…