Skip to main content
A Little Window Shopping

A well-known and highly respected journalist friend called me yesterday for a quick ‘sanity check’. “It’s this collaboration suite for small and medium-sized businesses that Oracle and Sun have announced, do you think that Microsoft’s customers are going to defect en masse or are they kidding themselves”?

This is, of course a solution that has Oracle’s software running on lower-cost Sun hardware and which has been certified on both Sun’s Solaris and supports Linux too, giving Sun customers a choice of platforms, UltraSparc or x86 processors.

What my friend was referring to directly was not so much Star Office, which Sun is promoting as the most sensible and cost effective alternative to Microsoft’s Office in the known-universe but Oracle’s own collaboration suite, which I understand consolidates multiple into a single integrated system. One feature in particular is a Microsoft-Exchange-like email server features, which can be accessed by Microsoft's Outlook client.

Do you think”, he asked, “That small businesses will dump the Exchange Server and migrate towards this Sun/Oracle partnership instead?”

“Let me answer by telling you of my own experience ” I replied.

For eighteen years, I ran The Lotus User Group and watched how one standard, Lotus 1-2-3, one day became Microsoft’s standard with Excel and Windows. I watched almost the same thing happen with cc:Mail and Lotus Notes, as businesses finally conceded that the messaging standard was Exchange. Ultimately even my own technical support team, forced the Lotus User Group to stop using Lotus Notes, in favour of Exchange, as our own internal mail system, because firstly it was the de-facto standard and secondly, it was cheaper and easier to support at the time.”

Regardless of whether Oracle’s application server and database combination offer better collaborative, software, my experience tells me that businesses just want messaging without most of the extra collaborative bells and whistles, which incur extra and expensive development work. Businesses are conservative and they buy into things called standards because they are safe, not because they are more expensive and when DTI Minister Steven Timms “Backs open source as future for UK business users”, I think he is jumping both the gun and the reality gap at the same time.

UK business, like UK government, may be looking at Open Source alternatives to the so-called Microsoft monopoly but it does not mean that they are planning to use them to any significant degree in the near term.

In my notes from December’s EURIM meeting on Open Standards/Open Source in e-government, I have written two comments. The first is that "Open Source is an unstoppable, disruptive technology" and the second, which is rather more damning of the present climate, simply says "No understanding of Open Standards, how these are put together and how these continue to a (a state of necessary) interoperability", which is the key to future success.

In my own mind, Microsoft represents the BMW of the business software world. When you buy Microsoft software you know what you are buying, there are no mysteries, there is a huge service industry to support your investment and you know it’s going to be an expensive, long and possibly uneventful relationship. Should the wheels fall off you mail server, then there is always someone available to fix the problem and have you back on the road again.

Alternatively, you could buy an Alfa Romeo. It looks great. It sounds great and you’ve always wanted one but it’s an Alfa Romeo and you just know what’s going to happen one day and the result will be very expensive.

Companies like standards. They like ‘safe’ and they don’t mind expensive so much if ‘safe’ is attached to the decision, rather like “You never got fired for buying IBM”.

It's my opinion that no amount of cheap horse power will convince small to medium size businesses to jump away from Microsoft Exchange towards a cheaper and more attractive Open Standards alternative until society has finished with the current business computing paradigm completely and that’s at least five years away. Until then, Sun and Oracle may need to come up with a more tempting package.

A pair of Open Source fluffy dice perhaps?


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …