Skip to main content
Weapons of Maths Instruction

I’ve just discovered why Broadband will become ultimately become pervasive. My eight year old daughter, a fan of ‘Mucha Lucha’ on the Cartoon Channel wants to play the games on the official Warner Brothers Website.

She already has two Sony Playstations (1&2) and can’t quite grasp my excuse that attempting to play an online game over the internet without Broadband access will be like watching paint dry.



But why can’t I play” she asks with her bottom lip trembling ominously and I can’t really explain that dial-up on BT from our multiple residential locations is cheaper and less complicated to arrange than Broadband, the speed I rarely need anyway.

In the end, the psychological pressure will become relentless and she’ll have her way, with Broadband fed straight to her Macintosh. I never really learned to how to say no to women and might as well surrender to the inevitable now to avoid a long drawn-out struggle that I can’t win.

Speaking of women and long drawn-out struggles, I asked a friend of mine, one of the most respected journalists in the Arab world what she thought about the progress of the war with Iraq so far. She replied:

What the US is doing is sickening and the Arabs for all their supposed non-support are standing by and eating McDonald's while the watching talking heads on Al-Jazeera. I am a nice normal person who feels like doing violence to nearly everyone these days”.



Meanwhile, CNN/Reuters: News reports have filtered out early this morning that US forces have swooped on an Iraqi Primary School and detained 6th Grade teacher Mohammed Al-Hazar. Sources indicate that, when arrested, Al-Hazar was in possession of a ruler, a protractor, a set square and a calculator. US President George W Bush argued that this was clear and overwhelming evidence that Iraq indeed possessed weapons of maths instruction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…