Skip to main content
The Question of Me

This could be me, writing this column but then again, it could be someone else and I, that’s if it’s really me at all, could be a victim of identity theft; although why anyone in their right minds might want to be me is another question altogether.

We were once preoccupied by the threat of being mugged for our mobile phones but now we worry over the risk of identity theft. In the United States alone, people are reporting the theft of their ‘identities’ to the FBI at a rate of one thousand calls a week and Britain is never far behind the example of America.

On this side of the pond, identity, digital or otherwise, remains a thorny issue. As a nation, we are culturally averse to carrying any formal means of identification, partly because as a society, one survey reveals, we trust our Government rather less than our European neighbours do.

In the decidedly low-tech world of paper, we have relied very much on National Insurance numbers as one of the most reliable means of proving an identity, to Government. But there’s a problem, There are at least a third more NI numbers in existence than there are people in the workforce and the same suspicion, I’m told, surrounds driving licenses, passports and just about every other kind of identity that springs to mind. This may explain why Saddam Hussein, is believed by some to be alive and well and claiming benefit in London.

More of us are relying on simple digital identities for on-line banking and other sensitive transactions but research shows that very few of us are taking sensible precautions to protect the details that authorise such transactions. Take PDAs’ as an example. Many thousands of us now use Personal Digital Assistants, iPaQ’s, Palm Pilots and many more of these increasingly powerful ‘Pocket PCs’ but a surprising number of us use absolutely no security on the devices themselves. Many of us store a huge amount of personal information in our Outlook contact list. This can include, Bank details and passwords and this information is replicated to devices which, when stolen or lost, provide the thief with much of the information required to take over another person’s identity or even crack a corporate network.

Stealing another person’s identity is not a particularly sophisticated crime. It can start with credit card ‘swiping’ in a restaurant or it can involve a stolen laptop or PDA and some simple ‘off the shelf’ password cracking software from the Web. It’s not clear how much of a problem identity theft is becoming in the UK but it’s a risk that each and every one of us should guard against through taking simple precautions, which can amount to firewalling our PCs and password protecting our PDAs

As time goes by, digital identities are bound to become a widespread form of ‘currency’ and it’s the instant power of digital credentials that are bound to cause concern without the widespread existence and protection of a foolproof system that can guarantee the ‘true’ identity of the person behind the transaction. We’re still a long way from achieving this and until we do, the very real threat of digital identity theft is something we should all take seriously.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …