Skip to main content
The Future Writ Large

In the country of the blind, the one-eyed man is King – Proverb

I almost saw it coming but even I was surprised at the size of the expensive truck that has slammed into the government’s website plans.

According to a report in the eGov monitor, “More than three quarters of central government websites may need to be redesigned to avoid discriminating against disabled people”. Furthermore and “According to official estimates, around 800 public sector websites may need rebuilding to comply with accessibility laws requiring government services to cater for disabled citizens”.

This isn’t good news for any of us. Not only will the mandatory refit of so many websites cost the taxpayer only a little less than that of the military’s recent excursion to Iraq but it illustrates what a total mess the entire web accessibility programme has been as standards and compliance issues were ignored by the webmasters. There was nobody waving a big stick or even a white stick at websites which were inaccessible or ‘potentially exclusive’ of ‘challenged’ groups within the population.

At this point, I feel the shadow of political correctness falling over me but I’m glad to say this is Computer Weekly and not The Guardian. I had a look at a website project last week, which had received over £100,000 of funding to develop a look and feel which was accessible. To me and without my spectacles on, it looked as if my eight year old had been trying to design an optician’s sight test with a copy of Word. It was absolutely awful. Worse still, how in heaven’s name, could the company, which will remain nameless, justify a six figure sum to produce what looked like an original Netscape 1.0 Web page of circa 1995?

Therein lies the problem. You and I rather like interesting and colourful web pages and so do the webmasters but last year’s 'Guidelines for UK Government Websites', published by the Office of the e-Envoy, reminds the public sector that accessibility is a fundamental consideration in web design. In future, government contracts will demand that companies deliver websites that conform to international web accessibility standards or at least meet the approval of David Blunkett’s Labrador, Sadie.

There’s talk of a “a massive shift of mindset within both government and industry to turn theory into practice” and the “problem is finding the people qualified to influence and implement these changes”. It now looks as if the Office of the e-Envoy may have to ride shotgun on the argument over what is to become ‘correct’ web design practise from now on but one wonders what government services may suffer because of the substantial web re-design bill that faces them.

As for what the new generation of public sector websites will look like, I wouldn’t like to guess but using certain fonts may one day be illegal and every home page may yet have to carry an approved and accessible likeness of the President, ours or theirs.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …