Skip to main content
Game On

It wasn’t so long ago that I wrote about the appearance of Linux – at least as a developer kit – on Sony’s Playstation 2 and warned that “The Penguin on the Playstation” might be the start of the first real competition that Windows has seen in over a decade.



Now I read that gaming is becoming a serious datacentre application in a release that tells me “IBM's ultra dense blade servers will be the backbone of a Linux-based grid that will enable millions of users and developers to access Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.'s PlayStation 2 games on the Internet”.

This is all about the arrival of ‘Grid computing’, a way of creating a single supercomputer by linking multiple servers together. It’s ‘The Matrix’ in real-life and resources can be shuffled between tens or even hundred’s of computers on demand.

When Microsoft originally planned its X-Box, it imagined that Broadband would be pervasive by the time it reached the market. This is one reason it made such a strong ‘play’ for the cable market in the States, with the idea that very soon, people would be running games over the Internet from Microsoft’s own ‘pay-per-game’ servers, with thousands of linked-up X-Boxes involved. This didn’t quite happen according to plan but the concept isn’t so far away anymore.

Grid computing on this scale isn’t quite ‘Plug and play’ just yet and some very powerful Middleware is required to make it all happen but IBM will reportedly use dual-Xeon BladeCenter servers in its hosting centres to run Butterfly. net’s middleware software on the grid. This illustrates what Microsoft first imagined and encouraged it to compete in a head-on clash with Sony; the migration of gaming from the console to the Internet.

IBM isn’t of course a culture you might readily associate with ‘Tomb Raider’ but it has 175 global hosting centres ready to support the PlayStation 2 grid if the anticipated demand appears.

Is Linux really up to the task? I met with the Open Group’s CEO, Alan Brown last week and we discussed Linux and where it works best. I mentioned that IBM, unlike Sun Microsystems, suggests that Linux is increasingly scalable and Brown remarked, that in his opinion Linux, which has a great ‘TCO’ message, would only “scale to thirty-two boxes” and if you want anything more, then you’re left with UNIX.

This leaves me thinking that the magic figure of ‘thirty-two’ isn’t quite on the scale of ‘The Matrix’ or even 175 global hosting centres, so I’m wondering what “Linux-based” really means and whether IBM executives will lose their blue suits and ties and start carrying skateboards in future?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…