Skip to main content
Fortune Favours the Cautious

“Seventy thousand small businesses to fold” was the banner headline in the business section of a leading Sunday newspaper. A little further on, a page devoted to the work of InterForum tells us that eBusiness is transforming our ‘Nation of Shopkeepers’, adjacent to a column which reveals that playing company paintball isn’t always the best way of building a good management team.



There are times when I wonder if the lunatics are running the asylum. Jeremy Clarkson and Richard Littlejohn certainly appear to think so and perhaps one or other of them should have a technology column.

On the one hand, you see, we’re being fed the message that spending money and effort on ‘e’ is having a transformative effect on the UK economy while on the other hand, the evidence suggests that red-tape, globalisation, high costs, taxes and insurance, are crippling our smaller businesses regardless of whether they are Web-enabled or not. In fact, I rather suspect that eBusinesses are failing as fast or even faster than any other kind of business.

A well-meaning government has fallen short of its target of having most businesses online. By this, I mean ‘really online’ not simply going through the motions or just using the telephone, which can, if the statistics demand it, be a grey area, rather like patients in the NHS. Being classified as an eBusiness just isn’t enough., because the ‘e’ that we’re really talking about isn’t a thing, it’s a risky, expensive, time consuming, educational process which can distract and cripple any small company which isn’t prepared for it.

This argument is all about the management of expectations and costs. Business is a fine example of evolutionary Darwinism at its best. You evolve too fast and you’re toast. You evolve too slowly and you’re somebody else’s toast. Statistically, fortune favours not the brave but companies that take technology’s promises with a pinch of salt; one very good reason for the downturn in the IT sector over the last two years. Since 2000, business has learned that a more cautious approach to technology results in a better return on investment but government continues to believe in fairies, which is why it appoints Tsars, to keep them under control.

I’m a firm believer in what technology can do for businesses of all sizes but at the same time, I’m reluctant to accept the argument that a company course of ‘e’, Broadband and a Enterprise Server license, might offer failing companies protection from the colder economic realities of 2003.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…