Skip to main content
Defence of the Realm

I had just finished duct-taping a plastic bag around my Yorkshire terrier’s head, following the instructions on ‘How to deal with the threat of gas attack’ found on the Home Office’s new anti-terrorism Web site, when I stumbled across the story on Broadband ‘revisionism’.

Now Broadband isn’t a topic that you might immediately associates with the House of Lords but it appears that on 11th March, the Earl of Northesk asked the Government if it had "arrived at a conclusive definition of broadband in respect of data transfer speeds for (a) the commercial market; and (b) the residential market".

Into the breach jumped Labour’s IT ‘spokes-peerson’, Lord Sainsbury, who replied:

“The Government views broadband as a generic term describing a range of technologies operating at various data transfer speeds."

Does anyone know what this means as it strikes me as equivalent to saying, “The definition of Broadband is Broadband”; a clever tautology that the forensically incisive Robin Cook might be proud of.

You may remember how three years ago, the criteria for an ‘Online’ business moved a little to include the telephone and this of course helped the DTI improve its figures for the UK as a leading information economy. Today, Broadband penetration is accelerating but obviously not fast enough and so two tin cans and a piece of strings may now qualify as a technology “operating at various data transfer speeds”, depending on how tight the string is pulled.

Next time you read about our remarkable Broadband figures, remember that the information revisionists have been ‘fiddling’ with the definition, as they have with just about everything else; crime, hospitals, taxes, refugees and so on, so why should Broadband Britain be any different?

Meanwhile, the dog is having problems breathing and the plastic bag has steamed-up. The Home Office site tells me that the best defence against terrorism is a torch, a bottle of water, tinned-food and a blanket but doesn’t say which colour. Does anybody know?


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…