Skip to main content
All Around the Watchtower

Now for the good news from government and I don’t mean more toilet paper for our troops in Kuwait or even shorter working hours for MPs. No, it’s better, even than that, because the Home Office is reportedly scaling-back its efforts to force through the legislation that will give government greater access to our email.

I’m particularly interested in this move because it was reported last summer, that the Computer Weekly column I wrote on the revisions to Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) had been passed to Mr Blunkett by his son and that this in turn, encouraged the Home Secretary to ‘see’ his existing amendments to RIPA for unworkable Stalinist rubbish they were.

This month then and with much muttering about ‘consultation’, the Home Office reportedly plans to have another try with a more watered-down version of RIPA, a ‘re-think’, which this time, denies the right of local government ‘officials’, conceivably, even traffic wardens to trawl through your email on a whim.

You see, if the original proposals hadn’t been so scathingly challenged by the likes of Newsnight’s Jeremy Paxman, then seven Whitehall departments, all local authorities, NHS bodies and eleven other agencies would have been given the same powers as the police and intelligence services and of course the real power in the land, the Inland Revenue and HM Customs & Excise.

So now, this cleverly re-thought proposal suggests instead that such powers, the “Right to demand access to the full range of communications data, be awarded to five new bodies, who might, in turn, be the Scottish drug enforcement agency, the Serious Fraud Office, NHS Trusts the UK Atomic Energy Constabulary and of course the Fire Service. Other "second-tier" organisations will have access only to subscriber data, such as customers' names and addresses”. Why the Fire Service you might ask? Why not says the Home Office.

This time, at least, the authority wishing to wield this power, will have to receive approval from a nominated senior official form each agency, rather than the approval of well any official who might have been around at the time.

So this is good news, right? Well only in as far as RIPA was the thin end of a much larger government wedge jammed up against what little statutory privacy is left to us. In principle this is bad legislation in new packaging and invariably, the Home Office will find other avenues to achieve its more sinister digital purpose, much like Thomas Cromwell in the time of King Henry VIII.

The legislation of the last five years has effectively undone much of the good work that started with Magna Carta and RIPA, is simply a manifestation of a different world where the clock started ticking on the morning of 9.11.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …