Skip to main content
Who's Who in Cyberspace?

It’s called a ‘Googlism’ apparently and I stumbled across it quite by accident.

I’m referring of course to a novel ‘service’ which trawls Google to report on how any name, thing or event ranks in the Internet’s greater scheme of things.

That doesn’t sound right, so bear with me. Take me as an example and why not? I’ve been ‘Googled’ and so if I now proceed on an ego trip of planetary proportions and write my name, ‘Simon Moores’ in the box, then Google tells me that there’s only one person of any real consequence with that name on the planet, me, which isn't good news for the other Simon Moores' around, one an eminent physician and the other, a Christian fundamentalist with strong opinions that are likely to get the rest of us shot!

This certainly is not good for egos but the results may not be what one expects. Of course, I would like it to return: “Simon Moores is a well-respected technology guru, gifted, witty, good looking and kind to small children and animals”. But instead, it offers more mundane details, such as “Simon Moores is a Director of Zentelligence” and “"Simon Moores is a recognised expert on cybercrime"” and “Simon Moores is Chairman of the Research Group”. Not any more I’m not.

Worse still, my brother-in-law, as seen in Hello Magazine, is described as a “As one of TV's tastiest chefs”.

Try looking-up old girlfriends or your own name to see if you have made your mark in cyberspace yet. If not there’s always time, unless of course you happen to share the same name as somebody famous such as Tony Blair or even Osama Bin Laden, who apparently “Is alive and well and living in Utah”.

It’s also nice to know that I’ve invented a new expression, an ‘ology’ for the English language, as in “Cyberchology is an expression conceived of by Simon Moores to describe the pathology of hacking and cybercrime”.

For sheer curiosity value, this is a site to visit for definitions but from an ego perspective its bad news, promising either crushing disappointment or unbearable smugness and nothing in between.

Don’t say I didn’t warn you!


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…