Skip to main content
.Not Quite .Net

“You don’t choose the things you believe in, they choose you” - Minority Report



Forgive me, but I’m trying to remember what .Net is. No, not Visual Studio.Net but Microsoft’s .Net, ‘The’ .Net, which I remember so confused us all when it was first announced.

I remember trying to explain it on the News one warm July 2000 evening and failing miserably. “It’s big”, I told the BBC’s John Moylan, “the biggest thing since Windows”. “Yes, but what is it, he asked. Is it a product or an Operating System”?

Well it’s both”, I said, "But it’s really clever plumbing. Gates says that “The Microsoft .Net platform is the infrastructure and tools to build and operate a new generation of services.” “It’s the next ‘Big Thing’ for the company and between you and me, I haven’t got a clue what they’re talking about and I’m not sure that they have either”.

Today of course, .Net is or was many things. It’s now a ‘Microsoft .Net Connected’ logo and that’s where it’s likely to meet its end, because after all .Net served a purpose by confusing the heck out of everyone at the time of its arrival and was a masterful ploy given the delicate legal situation that surrounded for Microsoft at the turn of the new millennium.

“Is this suggestive of a new attempt at expanding your monopoly Mr Gates”?

“Certainly not Your Honour. We’re building a future around services and .Net, which in layman’s terms involves connecting our next generation Windows and XML stuff to Internet stuff until such a time as everything is stuffed with .Net”.

In all fairness, by last year, Microsoft had paved the way for a new generation of PDAs and smart phones with a blizzard of television advertising that illustrated how things might look in a connected world. More recently, IBM has fought back with its own, very funny TV advertising, ‘The Time Machine’ and others which sweetens the truth and tells us that universal connectivity is still very much work in progress and that in Europe, you’ll still need an adapter for your universal adapter.

So as .Net becomes increasingly .Not and Windows goes back to being, well, just Windows, what’s my verdict on Microsoft’s dot? I’ll have to give it eight out of ten for annoying Sun Microsystems, just as Sun was busy trying to run off with the period in .Com and I’ll really have to give the Microsoft marketing team enormous credit for taking a concept, that they clearly didn’t understand at the time – they told me so –turning it into what was both a credible strategy and a new age religion of sorts, one that had businesses all over the world prepared to write cheques for.



It all goes to show that this industry is 40% technology, 10% innovation and 50% P.T. Barnum's Circus show.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…