Skip to main content
Viva Zapatista

Whether by accident or design, it very much looks as if Microsoft, in its attempts to find a more intelligent way of dealing with the threat that Linux poses to its Server revenues, is now reacting differently to “The War of the Flea”, I described in an earlier column.



Large American corporations frequently represent a cultural reflection of United States foreign policy where unwelcome competition is involved. Where the British dither and the French may use clandestine finesse and well-placed explosives, our cousins on the other side of the Atlantic have an emotional attachment to the B52 bomber, big, noisy, unsubtle and completely useless when it comes to dealing with today’s expanding ‘Zapatista’ protest culture of which Linux is increasingly a part.

You see, if ‘Che Guevara’ was still around today, he’d probably be wearing combat trousers and a t-shirt with a cigar-smoking, machine-gun toting Penguin on it. Linux has become a popular icon that represents everything which Microsoft isn’t. Whether the technology Linux offers is better or worse than anything that Redmond can sell us, is increasingly immaterial to an army of partisan developers. After all, whatever Linux can’t do for you this year, collaboration and a common-purpose will allow the people’s programmers to make work next year.



At last, Microsoft is beginning to comprehend that it’s not fighting the equivalent of a large tank battle purely around a question of technology preference. Mirroring the political situation which surrounds us today, Microsoft is fighting an ideological war for which it is not well equipped and which ultimately could prove more dangerous to its revenues than the creeping risk of a second, so-called ‘Axis of Evil’, Hewlett Packard, IBM and Sun Microsystems, promoting the benefits of Linux to their Enterprise customers.

So, this week, I read, that Microsoft is once again, dropping its special forces into a stand at the big LinuxWorld Conference and Expo in New York in an effort to reach out to the people that matter, the programmers and Unix enthusiasts and convince them that when the time comes to migrate, Windows on Intel is a better decision than Linux on the same platform.



The billion dollar question is whether this kind of activity is too little too late? Microsoft has had a good three years of trying to settle the Linux argument with a baseball bat and in that time, it has arguably been responsible for the creation of the Linux “sub-culture” that could one prove to be its undoing. I’m seeing signs that at last, the company is starting to understand the true shape of the Linux phenomenon and is attempting to define a new strategy, one capable of addressing both the technical and ideological arguments that it must win if it’s to be the dominant player in tomorrow’s Enterprise.

But that’s tomorrow and this is today and while Microsoft, with its back to the wall, decides its next move, I would argue that in a no-man’s land between technology and ideology, the company is still firmly pinned by horns of the dilemma that Linux represents.



One final point before people start predicting the inevitable victory of Open Source Computing over the powers of reactionary capitalism. In real life, Che was a revolutionary failure and the legend was far greater than the man!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…