Skip to main content
A Question of Identity

Following the murder of a Manchester Police officer during an ant-terrorist arrest yesterday, I wonder how many people would be in favour of 'All' asylum seekers and refugees carrying identity cards from tomorrow morning or risk immediate imprisonment or deportation. It's an emotional issue at a time of public risk and the privacy lobby - the thin line of protest and debate between us and the Home Office - have their own view on what should and should not be done as regards the question of entitlement or Identity cards. What do you think? Read on....

David Blunkett gave a keynote speech on his proposed entitlement/identity cards today - but once again conspicuously failed to explain what exactly the proposed £1.6 billion cards would be for.

He did, though, concede that "people need more information", and are "hungry for knowledge" on the implications and practicalities of cards and for the answer to the simple question, "what's the Government up to?". Those questions arose from the Government's focus groups - and, from Mr Blunkett's acknowledgement that members of the Cabinet have "different views" on ID cards, are presumably being raised there too. But the wider public still aren't being told the answers.

The Home Office has rejected the idea of holding open public meetings - despite Mr Blunkett implying the contrary today - and has organised none. In fact, the only public meeting held on this issue before today was organised by Privacy International, Liberty and FIPR.

Simon Davies, director of Privacy International, says: "Mr Blunkett concedes that the Cabinet is split. "He may not be listening to public opinion, but clearly some in the Cabinet are. Responses to the consultation are now running at least four-to-one against the Government's proposals".

Simon Davies

Ian Brown, director of the Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR), says: "The Home Secretary is still casting about for problems to justify this expensive and increasingly unpopular initiative. He has, though, admitted that ethnic minorities will quickly have to carry the card to produce when stopped by the police".

Mark Littlewood, campaigns director of Liberty, says: "The government should ditch its ID card plan. The more people hear about David Blunkett's scheme, the less they like it. Billions of pounds spent so the government can snoop on innocent British citizens is money wasted. If the Home Secretary goes ahead with this ludicrous proposal, he will face trenchant opposition from across the political spectrum. The time has come to call a halt".

Mr Blunkett was speaking at the Information Commissioner's conference in London today.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…