Skip to main content
It's Not Your Java - It's Their Java

"A new dark age, made more sinister.. by the lights of perverted science"



Winston Churchill of course but he might have been anticipating this latest turn of events in the Java feud between Microsoft and Sun last month

Microsoft may have fought them on the beaches but it now has its back to the sea and Sun Microsystems, in a second victory, has won a preliminary injunction in its own private antitrust case against Microsoft, this time requiring the unhappy loser to carry Sun's Java and not Redmond's own Cappuccino; a pun on the C# language for those of you following the .Net story -

Once again, Microsoft has faced an unsympathetic if not hostile judge. On this occasion, Judge Frederick Motz compared Microsoft's treatment of Java to the Tonya Harding ‘kneecapping’ efforts of her ice-skating rival, adding with a true American flourish, that "Capitalism is about making money, but it's also about something else. It's also about pride of product."

Motz continued “If .NET eventually proves victorious, "it should be because of .NET's superior qualities, not because Microsoft leveraged its PC monopoly to create market conditions in which it is unfairly advantaged."



Sticking with the argument that Microsoft, now a wholly reformed character, has no sinister designs on Java, the company’s witness, University of Chicago economics professor Kevin Murphy, testified that Microsoft's current software market advantage doesn't justify forcing it to include Java in its products. This is rubbish say Sun's lawyers who claim that Microsoft is preventing the growth of Java. Hardly an endangered species Microsoft countered pointing out that nearly half of the software development community already uses Java.

The central legal issue in question is whether Sun successfully established before the court what is known as ‘the standard of harm’; can damage to the progress of Java be demonstrated without equivocation and Judge Motz was far less clear, whether that legal standard had been met.

Microsoft, would of course rather have its teeth slowly pulled than see Sun's purer flavour of Java replace its own 'optimised' but very popular brew and strangely enough, I have next to me, an original first issue of my own JavaVision Magazine, from 1997, in which I ask 'Who is going to win the much-publicized row between Microsoft and Sun"?

Six years ago, which is as long as this scrap has been going on in the courts, Microsoft is quoted as saying:

"We do not believe the world will converge to a single programming language any time soon"
Or a single platform either - And that was in 1997...!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…