Skip to main content
It's Not Your Java - It's Their Java

"A new dark age, made more sinister.. by the lights of perverted science"



Winston Churchill of course but he might have been anticipating this latest turn of events in the Java feud between Microsoft and Sun last month

Microsoft may have fought them on the beaches but it now has its back to the sea and Sun Microsystems, in a second victory, has won a preliminary injunction in its own private antitrust case against Microsoft, this time requiring the unhappy loser to carry Sun's Java and not Redmond's own Cappuccino; a pun on the C# language for those of you following the .Net story -

Once again, Microsoft has faced an unsympathetic if not hostile judge. On this occasion, Judge Frederick Motz compared Microsoft's treatment of Java to the Tonya Harding ‘kneecapping’ efforts of her ice-skating rival, adding with a true American flourish, that "Capitalism is about making money, but it's also about something else. It's also about pride of product."

Motz continued “If .NET eventually proves victorious, "it should be because of .NET's superior qualities, not because Microsoft leveraged its PC monopoly to create market conditions in which it is unfairly advantaged."



Sticking with the argument that Microsoft, now a wholly reformed character, has no sinister designs on Java, the company’s witness, University of Chicago economics professor Kevin Murphy, testified that Microsoft's current software market advantage doesn't justify forcing it to include Java in its products. This is rubbish say Sun's lawyers who claim that Microsoft is preventing the growth of Java. Hardly an endangered species Microsoft countered pointing out that nearly half of the software development community already uses Java.

The central legal issue in question is whether Sun successfully established before the court what is known as ‘the standard of harm’; can damage to the progress of Java be demonstrated without equivocation and Judge Motz was far less clear, whether that legal standard had been met.

Microsoft, would of course rather have its teeth slowly pulled than see Sun's purer flavour of Java replace its own 'optimised' but very popular brew and strangely enough, I have next to me, an original first issue of my own JavaVision Magazine, from 1997, in which I ask 'Who is going to win the much-publicized row between Microsoft and Sun"?

Six years ago, which is as long as this scrap has been going on in the courts, Microsoft is quoted as saying:

"We do not believe the world will converge to a single programming language any time soon"
Or a single platform either - And that was in 1997...!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…