Skip to main content
Going-up - Falling Down

More of a short story today. The Blogger Website has been unavailable and I'm assuming this is a result of SQL-Slammer continuing to wreak havoc, much to Microsoft's embarrasment on the first anniversary of 'Trustworthy Computing'.

Slammer appears to have hit much harder than anyone first expected and the cleaning-up operation could continue into the weekend. Meanwhile, this is my fourth and final attempt to complete this entry before the Web site dies with a flood of SQL error messages.

One reader of my CW360 column writes: "Apathy may be the cause of a certain percentage of the unpatched SQL Server boxes. However, IT understaffing and fear of managerial reprisals for patching a production SQL Server installation and taking it out of commission are more likely to be the culprits for Slammer infections"

An interesting view that hadn't occurred to me before.

I need to collect my thoughts around eGovernment once more. Yesterday was a struggle getting home on the underground. Not only was the Central Line dead but the District Line also faltered. We may lead the world in the development of 'Transactional' eGovernment but in sharp contrast, government can't even make the trains run, not just on time, but at all in some places...!

There's a curious irony at work here. London, one of world's greatest cities is crumbling into a third-world chaos and disrepair and yet, we somehow expect our huge eGovernment programme to have a transformative effect on our society? It's a wonderful dream but I'd gladly sacrifice cheap Broadband if I could find a regular, reliable and clean train, find a spot to park my motorcycle or simply see our soldiers provided with the proper boots before we send them off to whistle the 'Star-spangled Banner'.



And before you ask. No I'm not a left-wing Guardian reader but as the philosopher Socrates once said, "The unexamined life is not worth living".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…