Skip to main content
Edge of Darkness



In the same week that saw ageing pop idol Gary Glitter deported from Cambodia on charges relating to the sexual exploitation of juveniles, further revelations are appearing in today's newspapers that a second 'Rock Legend' has been interviewed by the Police in connection with Operation Ore.

Simultaneously, musician, Pete Townshend has appeared on television, reportedly denying that he has ever been involved in any paedophile activity.



Since a bogus FBI paedophile Web site successfully 'Stung' several thousand UK citizens (Operation Ore) a couple of months ago, we are starting to see the stomach-churning size of a social problem, which the internet facilitates and which no amount of policing can ever defeat. It appears that thousands upon thousands of our citizens are regularly visiting paedophile websites and a 'hard' percentage, which includes police officers, judges, MPs, teachers and other respectable pillars of society, are happy to use their credit cards to fund further exploitation and abuse of children.

It is important to note that the crime or ecrime being discussed here, involves the possession and/or distribution of indecent material and that 'Research', in other words viewing an image on-line, is not the greater part of the criminal offense. Consequently it becomes hard to accept with any degree of credulity that an individual might pass his or her credit card details to a sex website - quite possibly controlled by the Russian Mafia -, simply to research harder core materials. Simply 'Entering' the site in question involves a crime and simultaneousy combines great personal risk and mind-numbing stupidity.

In fact, what images are viewed will invariably finish up as a temporary file in the the Windows/Temp directory and this important detail generally is unnoticed by the user. However, the physical existence of such temporary files, to my understanding, may still constitute a crime of possession under British law and so going anywhere near a paedophile website, however 'genuine' the research intention, is not worth the risk unless one happens to be sitting inside Scotland Yard surrrounded bya dozen Police officers who can vouch for one's reasons for being there.

As a society, we need to think more clearly about the crime, the level of deterrence offered by the courts and indeed, whether the Internet can continue in its uncensored form without a moral consequence to the liberal and developed societies that now depend on it.



NB: Operation Ore is the UK ring of a huge FBI operation which traced 250,000 paedophiles worldwide last year through credit card details used to pay for downloading child porn.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…