Skip to main content
The Big Issue

It's not all gloom and doom this morning. While Sun never rose in 2002 and saw its revenue. for the six months ended 29th December 2002 fall 5% to $5.66bn, IBM managed to fall nearer 6% all told. Happier news for Microsoft though, as Q2 results for the period ended 31st December Turnover were $16.3bn up 17.5% on the comparative period last year. Net income rose 48% to $5.3bn.



The company attributed the growth to "increased sales of Microsoft Xbox, recognition of unearned revenue from strong multi-year licencing in prior periods, and licencing of Microsoft Windows server and server applications".

All of Microsoft’s seven divisions delivered growth, the highlights include:

Home and entertainment (where Xbox resides) recorded the highest revenue growth of 48% to $1.8bn (but that’s still only 11% of total revenues) and the FT reports that this fell below expectations.

- CE/Mobility (includes pocket PC, Handheld PC) rose 40.9% to $39m (but less than 1% of total revenues).

- Server platforms (which includes SQL) rose 12.9% to $3.4bn, but its share of total turnover actually declined a point to 21%.

Despite Microsoft’s plans to diversify into other areas the desktop still dominates, accounting for 61% of total revenues.

By channel Americas rose 8.9% to $6bn, EMEA was up 33.6% to $3.4bn and Japan and Asia Pac up 17.2% to $1.7bn, OEM rose 19% to $5.2bn.

On the outlook John Connors, CFO, said "while we are very optimistic about the future of the technology sector, we do not expect to see a significant upturn in global IT spending in the short term". The company also declared an annual dividend for the first time and approved a two-for-one share split on Microsoft common stock

Source Ovum Holway.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…