Skip to main content
There Are No Secrets

Let's be honest, as long as someone inside the UK Foreign Office is leaking confidential memos to the Cryptome Web site, it is an entirely futile exercise for the Government to request that the Sunday Times, which keeps popping on to the Web to read the latest revelations, doesn't print the source of its information.

It hardly takes a degree in computer science to track down the offending Web site via one of the large search engines and in this case, it was a Foreign & Commonwealth Office report on the visit to the UK by Sergei Ivanov, the man on the right in the photograph; another retired secret agent described as "Putin's closest adviser".



What was as interesting as the discussion on Chechnya and Iran was the Russian view on 'Infomation Security'.

If I find myself in a Police cell over Xmas, then you now know why but according to the contents of the memo on Cryptome's US Web site, conveniently out of the reach of the UK courts:

"Chernov, one of Ivanov's staff at the PUS' dinner launched a diatribe about the threat which the internet and an "uncontrolled information space" posed to world security. He depicted the internet as the major global threat over the next 5-10 years. But Ivanov added that current Russian legislation on the media was one of the most liberal in the world"

If the the UK can't prevent confidential government memos leaking on to the Internet then one can understand the harder-line Russian view of the challenges surrounding Internet security. I rather suspect, that as a consequence of such problems, Microsoft's plans the for forthcoming 'Palladium', cryptographic security platform ( see Trusted Computing Platform Alliance TCPA) will be rather more popular with some Governments than we might have first suspected.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…