Skip to main content
That Was the Year – That Was

Before I write a last column for 2002, looking forward to the coming year, the editor has asked me look back over the last twelve months and pick out two quite different stories that interested me most.

You know, there wouldn’t be a ‘Thought for the Day’ without ‘Blogging’, the Weblog phenomenon of 2002. This gives everyone the opportunity of publishing, well anything really, on a public Web site and millions of people now ‘Blog’ their opinions and diaries on the Web each day.



I started this year with my own Blog at www.zentelligence.blogspot.com and this daily exercise evolved into ‘Thought for the Day’. However, it strikes me that very soon, some IT news sites will start to incorporate Blogs into their content, if only because some rather interesting people are ‘Blogging’ away each day.

Take Alan Mather, the CEO (eDelivery) at the Office of the e-Envoy as one example. Alan is a man at the sharp end of e-Government and the Government Gateway is just one of the projects in his care. Visit his very lucid Blog and you’ll find out more frank opinion on the process and challenges of electronic government than you would expect in most news stories and press releases.

And there’s the point on Blogging. Not only does it represent the new ‘Vox Pop’ of the 21st century but it’s creating an informed alternative to more conventional news resources. Visit Mather’s innocuous sounding DiverDiver Blog and you’ll see that he has added links to other Blogs written by many of the leading independent thinkers on eGovernment. Where else would one find that kind of debate I wonder? So Blogging has my vote as one of the more important conceptual developments of 2002.

Secure by design, by default and by defense. I’m talking about SD3, Microsoft’s vision of Trustworthy Computing, a strategy, described by Bill Gates at the beginning of this year and one on which the future of the company arguably rests.

When Scott Charney, Microsoft’s Chief Security Strategist was in town this month, he talked about ‘Limiting the attack surface’, as the company urgently shifts its centre of balance away from ease of use towards the goal of much greater security. In the face of constant attacks on its products, Microsoft has now spent tens of millions reversing its previous policy of the security switch being in the ‘Off’ position, in favour of a totally new and outrageous concept, the ‘On’ position.



Of course, the argument is a great deal more complicated than this, as the company feeds its software on steroids and hopes that better education and an improved ‘immune’ system will improve confidence in an environment on which most of us have come to depend on and worry about at the same time.

In Microsoft’s defence, and after two months of research, I can’t really endorse the claim that a wholesale defection towards some vaguely defined and standardised Nirvana of Open Source computing will fix the security problem that faces us in the short term. It’s going to take at least two years, if not three, before the results of Bill Gates personal epiphany results in greater integrity within the computing environment, racing to confront a content security threat which shows every sign of doubling every twelve months.

What Microsoft does or doesn’t do has influenced our decisions for over a decade now and it’s easy to fall into the trap of believing, as so many consumers do, that Microsoft ‘Is’ the IT industry. This year however, with recession snapping at the heels of the IT giants, there’s been very little news capable of capturing the imagination. 2002 was a year which had business concentrating on finding the real value in the systems that had been installed as a response to the Y2K threat. The urgency to replace and experiment of previous years just wasn’t visible in 2002. The Internet bubble had burst and the survivors of the roller-coaster ride that had preceded it were now more interested in return on investment than at any other time in the last twenty years.

This last year represented a watershed change in the way that many businesses perceived the benefits of IT and its contribution to the balance sheet. New Labour may have been in government but in the IT industry, 2002 was the year of a New Conservatism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …