Skip to main content
End of Days

Everyone can sleep safe this Xmas. I’ve been made an honorary Special Agent of the Office of Special (Computer) Investigations & Operations and have an authentic piece of brass to prove it.

You may have noticed, that there’s no such thing as an ‘ordinary’ agent; the runaway success of the X-files made all of us agents equally special and with my black Armani suit and my dark glasses, I’m looking forward to taking up the open invitation to Washington for a guided tour of the top secret facility which collects all Santa’s email.

This week, of course, I’m looking forward to 2003 and I’m going to ‘buck’ the doomsday trend, which had my wife asking whether wrapping the Terrier in cling-film might be protection against a possible VX Gas attack on Wimbledon Common.

IDC and other ostensibly responsible and informed sources, are predicting, that galvanised by a war against Iraq, a “A major cyber terrorism event will occur that “will disrupt the economy and bring the Internet to its knees for at least a day or two”.

You’ll note that this isn’t a possible war, one with the full support of the United Nations but rather, “the war”, a match fixture on a date to be arranged, which as a one time Royal Marine, fails to stir my enthusiasm.

Although there’s plenty of evidence that diverse political interests, Hamas, the Iron Guards and others, are increasingly leveraging the Internet as a potential target of opportunity, personally, I don’t subscribe to the ‘catastrophic’ school of thought for 2003. I could of course be terribly wrong but activity of the kind to date has involved relatively low intensity denial of service and business interruption, annoying, expensive but not sophisticated or organised enough to bring the West to its knees quite yet.

Terrorism, I argued at the High-tech Crime Conference has a perverse entertainment value and while the information infrastructure represents the soft-belly of the developed world, large explosions and other acts of terror have far more visual and emotional impact on CNN.

In my opinion, while 2003 will be a year of increasing business disruption as corporate weakness is increasingly probed from outside the firewall, it won’t be they year that sees all the power stations on the US North-east coast switched off in the depths of Winter by a determined hacker – one of the scenarios that was considered - .

Given the sorry state of information security on a global basis, built on a “bed of Swiss cheese” as I’ve described it, there’s an inevitability surrounding some kind of high-profile ‘Take-down’ of a large institution for either criminal or political motivation. My advice to all our readers is that your first New Year’s resolution should involve a reassessment of your information security policy, be prepared, remember the lessons of Y2K and don’t be encouraged into a sense of paranoia by the prophets of digital disaster.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…