Skip to main content
Cogito Ergo Sum

I watched a programme recently, where one of the world's most eminent neurologists revealed a fundamental flaw in our understanding of consciousness.

Very simply, we don't think and then act. We act and then think about acting about 200 milliseconds later.

To be honest, I lost some sleep over this as it presents a neurological equivalent of the famous physics 'interference' experiment, which should have bands of light cancelling each other out but doesn't.

You see, if the brain makes a decision and mind only appears to offer a commentary on our actions and is in fact, not responsible for them, then what, one wonders is?

In fact, this led me to thinking on the Zen connection, Eugen Herrigel's 'Zen & The Art of Archery', because what appears to be being described is something that has been known about since the dawn of eastern philosophy. One is 'conscious' the unconscious, 'It', when studying the different martial arts, such as Japanese archery or Iaido or even calligraphy and flower arranging; involving rapid spontaneous movement of the hand illustrating intuitive rather than intellectual thought; 'cutting spiritually', an 'It cuts' feeling with a sword being something that I may never correctly achieve in Iaido without a lifetime of practise and patience.

Herrigel, whose picture is shown below and who both taught and studied philosophy in Japan in the thirties, wrote:

"If everything depends on the archer's becoming purposeless and effacing himself in the event, then its outward realization must occur automatically, in no further need of the controlling or reflecting intelligence."

Pondering the parallels between Eatern mysticism and the sub-atomic world, the great physicist Werner Heisenberg wrote:

The great scientific contribution in theoretical physics that has come from Japan since the last war, may be an indication of a certain relationship between philosophical ideas in the tradition of the Far East and the philosophical substance of Quantum theory.

Makes you wonder or perhaps it should?


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …