Skip to main content
Cogito Ergo Sum

I watched a programme recently, where one of the world's most eminent neurologists revealed a fundamental flaw in our understanding of consciousness.

Very simply, we don't think and then act. We act and then think about acting about 200 milliseconds later.

To be honest, I lost some sleep over this as it presents a neurological equivalent of the famous physics 'interference' experiment, which should have bands of light cancelling each other out but doesn't.

You see, if the brain makes a decision and mind only appears to offer a commentary on our actions and is in fact, not responsible for them, then what, one wonders is?

In fact, this led me to thinking on the Zen connection, Eugen Herrigel's 'Zen & The Art of Archery', because what appears to be being described is something that has been known about since the dawn of eastern philosophy. One is 'conscious' the unconscious, 'It', when studying the different martial arts, such as Japanese archery or Iaido or even calligraphy and flower arranging; involving rapid spontaneous movement of the hand illustrating intuitive rather than intellectual thought; 'cutting spiritually', an 'It cuts' feeling with a sword being something that I may never correctly achieve in Iaido without a lifetime of practise and patience.

Herrigel, whose picture is shown below and who both taught and studied philosophy in Japan in the thirties, wrote:

"If everything depends on the archer's becoming purposeless and effacing himself in the event, then its outward realization must occur automatically, in no further need of the controlling or reflecting intelligence."

Pondering the parallels between Eatern mysticism and the sub-atomic world, the great physicist Werner Heisenberg wrote:

The great scientific contribution in theoretical physics that has come from Japan since the last war, may be an indication of a certain relationship between philosophical ideas in the tradition of the Far East and the philosophical substance of Quantum theory.

Makes you wonder or perhaps it should?


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…