Skip to main content
A Near Miss

I’m sitting here trying to write a report. It has a rather dry title: ‘Confidence in the Computing Environment and its Implications for Public Sector Strategy and Security Policy’. It doesn’t quite have the pace of Andy McNabb or even Tom Clancy and to tell the truth, I seem to have found rather more villains than heroes hidden in the text, which is only to be expected, as month by month, confidence appears to decline as the incidence of attack, on all systems, continues to increase.

Today, The Wall Street Journal is running a story on how Al Qaeda subverted the Internet but it comes as no great surprise to anyone who has been tracking the security advisories over recent weeks and months. You see, the evidence suggests that hacking and all the many different forms of information crime, cybercrime if you like, has become increasingly politicised over the last twelve month and increasingly so since the escalation of violence on the West Bank in April. The Internet is now emerging as a cheap and powerful delivery system, capable of great disruptive power over long distances and with minimal risk to any individual or group, wishing to illustrate the strength of its argument with direct confrontation against companies or governments.

So, you say, the keyboard is replacing the Kalashnikov, well…?

Retreating into the world of fiction, this is possibly true where the communications infrastructure is concerned. Parachute a few skilled Al Qaeda sympathisers into selected jobs in the Internet, finance or telecoms sector and I’m sure the result could be quite interesting and along the lines of a Tom Clancy novel that had the New York stock exchange crippled by the introduction of rogue worm code at a pre-determined moment.

Will the terrorists become Internet-savvy and come after our critical infrastructure? It’s always possible but I rather suspect that the Web doesn’t offer the noisy, high-impact visual attention that groups, such as Al Qaeda crave. Instead I think that much of this new political dimension and its effect, will remain broadly regional, as with the Islamic, ‘Iron Guards’ hammering Israeli websites and the Taiwanese and the mainland Chinese hacker groups, slogging-it-out in cyberspace.

As its going to take at least another two more years before the example of Microsoft’s ‘Trustworthy Computing’ strategy really starts to have a pull-through effect on information security at all levels, it’s my guess, from looking at figures and running a quick, ‘back of a matchbox’ risk analysis, that at the current rate of incident growth, we should reasonably expect an Internet equivalent of the Titanic to occur somewhere within the next twelve to eighteen months. Whether this could be the consequence of some kind of political motive or whether it’s simply a malicious experiment is broadly irrelevant but like some steadily approaching asteroid threat, there’s very little chance of preventing the inevitable impact or at the very least, a near miss.

And like September 11th, we will probably regard the question of Internet security in before and after terms as a consequence.

How confident are you in the computing environment?


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …