Skip to main content
A Matter of Trust

I’m going to present you with an argument. You may not agree with it but I believe that its time to take a fresh look at the ideological battle raging between two well-entrenched armies, the Open Source community and Microsoft.

Most of us, have at one time read ‘Gulliver’s Travels’. A few of us may also remember why the Lilliputians were at war and had been as long as anyone could remember. It was the result of an argument over which end of a boiled-egg, should be opened and eaten first, the big end or the small end?

For over three years, I have been closely watching the progress of the Open Source software movement and Microsoft’s reaction to its challenge. Most of the time, it’s like watching two large dogs barking at each other on opposite sides of the same fence. There’s a great deal of noise but very little in the way of useful, sensible debate, the kind of thing which allows an IT Director to consider the many different arguments in a single, well-reasoned package and act accordingly.

You see, what has happened, is that like the story in Gulliver’s Travels, the Open-source vs. Proprietary software, has descended into the realms of emotional and political argument; Tux the cuddly Linux penguin vs. the great Seattle Satan.

But this is far from being a black and white argument and much of the time the different camps have an “apples and oranges” approach to the argument, in much the same manner as the Americans insist on discussing Iraq while the Arab World would rather resolve the Palestinian problem first.

What are the facts? Is this really as simple as a strategic choice between Microsoft and Linux? One of the two presents a greater security risk to business, costs more money in the long-term and from a developer perspective is environmentally unfriendly but which one? Do you know? I mean, do you really know or are you, like me, caught in the middle of a propaganda battle which has left the truth scattered in a muddy no-man’s land between two colliding ideologies.

The existence if the Open-source debate is good for the industry and its good for business but it needs to be just that, an intelligent debate and not the playground slanging match, the constant low intensity warfare that leaves business wondering whether last month’s security alerts are a defining metric in an argument which is increasingly losing its way.

If 2002 started with a demand for Trustworthy Computing then perhaps 2003 should be the year that introduces the concept of intelligent computing or at the very least, intelligent and well-reasoned argument?

From a computing perspective, it’s what lies at the middle of the egg which is important and how you arrive there is simply a matter of personal preference.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Matter of Drones - Simon Moores for The Guardian

I have a drone on my airfield” – a statement that welcomes passengers to the latest dimension in air-travel disruption. Words of despair from the chief operating officer of Gatwick airport in the busiest travel week of the year. Elsewhere, many thousands of stranded and inconvenienced passengers turned in frustration to social media in an expression of crowd-sourced outrage.

How could this happen? Why is it still happening over 12 hours after Gatwick’s runways were closed to aircraft, why is an intruder drone – or even two of them – suspended in the bright blue sky above the airport, apparently visible to security staff and police who remain quite unable to locate its source of radio control?

Meanwhile, the UK Civil Aviation Authority, overtaken by both the technology and events, is reduced to sending out desperate tweets warning that an airport incursion is a criminal offence and that drone users should follow their new code of conduct. Yet this is not an unforeseen event. It was i…
A Christmas Tale

It’s pitch blackness in places along the sea wall this evening and I'm momentarily startled by a small dog with orange flashing yuletide antlers along the way. I’m the only person crazy enough to be running and I know the route well enough to negotiate it in the dark, part of my Christmas exercise regime and a good way of relieving stress.

Why stress you might ask. After all, it is Christmas Day.

True but I’ve just spent over two hours assembling the giant Playmobil ‘Pony Farm’ set when most other fathers should be asleep in front of the television.



I was warned that the Playmobil ‘Pirate Ship’ had driven some fathers to drink or suicide and now I understand why. If your eyesight isn’t perfect or if you’ve had a few drinks with your Christmas lunch then it’s a challenge best left until Boxing day but not an option if you happen to have a nine year old daughter who wants it ready to take horses by tea time.

Perhaps I should stick to technology but then, the instruc…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…