Skip to main content
A Job for Mr Bond - James Bond

At a guess, it took under ninety seconds to locate the minutes of the meeting of the Whitehall PMC (Private Military Companies – Mercenaries) Group of 16th November 1999. Now while the government is keen that the address of the US-based Web site hosting such sensitive and in fact, classified information isn’t published, I have to wonder whether there is any point hiding the address from the general public in this country, when Al Qaeda of anyone else, come to that, could find it as easily as I can and with it, the names and telephone numbers of the many intelligence agencies personnel involved.

What interests me about this document, which has now slipped into the public domain, isn’t so much how, in 1999, we were worrying about mercenaries in Africa but rather how the information technology on which government relied was almost as big a problem as the danger it was attempting to address. “There was a failure of joined-up government; Departments were not pooling their knowledge”

Government had invested in what appears to be a knowledge management application code-named ‘Fortress’ and to quote from the minutes:

“Twelve months on, the consensus in CTPD is that Fortress has proved to be slower, less reliable, less practical, but more costly than the old paper distribution of intelligence. If the system cannot be improved we would prefer to return to paper distribution”. “We estimate that it takes us five times as long to process reports on Fortress than on paper: not a very efficient use of our time”

I won’t go into any more detail, as I’m sailing rather close to the wind by writing about this, even if it does raise the usual questions about freedom of information in our society and how this sits with Mr Blair’s vision of universal Internet access by 2006.

What for me, is more interesting than worrying where this thing called the public domain happens to exist, is the evidence that in the most sensitive and ‘Mission Critical’ areas of government, IT was, at least in 1999, failing as miserably and as expensively as everywhere else, except that it was a secret and that the security services were seriously considering a return to paper and carrier pigeons.

I rather hope by now, Fortress and the other classified information systems referred to in the document have been ‘sorted-out’ or I wonder, was the debacle last week over a ‘Silly’ and ‘Non-existent’ terrorist threat to the London Underground, another example of an information management problem?

When we think of joined-up government, we naturally look towards the more mundane aspects of the public sector and the wins and losses that are an everyday part of reporting the struggle towards the 2005 target of 100% service delivery. We forget, that below the surface, there are the systems supporting the national critical infrastructure and intelligence communities that cost the taxpayer many millions of pounds from budgets that will never see the light of day.

In this twilight world, the prospect of technology failure could have consequences that none of us would really wish to consider..

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…