Skip to main content
Trust Me – I’m a Doctor

Does anybody own a Skoda or know any good Skoda jokes?

It wasn’t so long ago that the thought of a Skoda achieving a favourable comparison with an Audi, seemed as improbable an idea as associating, well Microsoft, with any suggestion of secure computing. You could have any colour you liked, even add a nodding dog or a pair of fluffy dice but you weren’t going to impress people with your credibility. Until that is, the day, everything changed. The Skoda became almost respectable.

You may remember, that last month, I told you that Microsoft’s Chief Security Officer, Stuart Okin, in a last-ditch effort to convince me that the company was serious about “Trustworthy Computing”, flung open the doors of the Microsoft Campus in Reading and offered me unrestricted and uncensored access to anyone I would like to question about the seriousness of the company’s security strategy. There isn’t the space here for a detailed report, which will come later but I’ll share my early impressions with you.

Microsoft, like Skoda, has an image problem. Skoda, has gone a long way towards solving their own but Microsoft, try as hard it likes, can’t shift the weary cynicism that surrounds its claims that it’s software now has security as a number-one priority and that improvements are already beginning to show. But this new commitment to more secure computing, that started back in April confronts the company with a number of different problems. As one person I spoke with commented, “Trust is not something that you can enforce, it’s a process” and the results are frequently invisible.

What I’m asked, should the company do. Should it keep vulnerabilities a secret until a patch is available or should it disclose an exploit the moment it appears? It’s firmly wedged between a dilemma of its own making and unlike the Labour spin-doctors at Milbank, hasn’t yet found a third-way of explaining its policies.

Ironically, most of the people I have spoken to inside the company so far, agree that ‘Trustworthy Computing’ was, with the benefit of hindsight, the wrong expression to describe what Microsoft is trying to achieve, because trust and Microsoft, like Skoda and quality, don’t sit comfortably together in the collective unconscious. Responsible computing might have been a better choice. Why because the company, pointing at the statistics, wants its customers to understand that security is a partnership, where both vendor and customer share an equal responsibility to ensure that all possible precautions have been taken to avoid a security compromise. In fact, Microsoft tells me that it has now made a higher security setting a default in its products, reversing its previous policy, which for faster and easier installation, had security in an optional state. “It’s a functional trade-off”, I’m told “But it’s the beginning of a change which impacts all our software, which previously focused far more on ease-of-use over other considerations”.

Of course, there’s more digging yet to be done before I can confidently declare that Microsoft, like Jeffrey, is a reformed character, even though, as the company admits, the legacy of millions of users with earlier versions of Windows will be with us for several more years yet. There’s no magic wand at work here, simply seeing the light won’t be enough to switch-off the threat until we’re all using up-to-date software and clearly understand what steps are required to keep the hackers and scrip-kiddies at a comfortable distance.

What I did say to my Microsoft friends over lunch, is that if we’re going to talk about Responsible Computing and Microsoft losing that Skoda image, then its back to school for the company to study the ‘Three R’s’, which in this case happen to be ‘Responsibility, Reliability and Respect’. Without these three in equal measure, as fundamental principles of both software engineering and marketing, reforming the company’s Skoda-like image and reputation for security is a non-starter. But there’s always hope, even for Microsoft, so watch this space!


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…