Skip to main content
Taxes to Caesar

Why anyone would let themselves be persuaded to get-up at four-thirty in the morning, is a mystery, unless of course it happens to involve breakfast television.

Last week, my ego got the better of my desire for a good night’s sleep and I found myself challenging Gartner’s optimism, as I reviewed IBM’s latest set of results, which like Microsoft’s were rather better than expected in a week which saw the value of the FTSE and Wall Street indices dip and dive more energetically than ever.

“Is the technology sector showing signs of coming out of recession?” asked my interviewer. Biting my tongue, I offered a polite no but with some examples.

In a period of seven days, nine people I know have lost their jobs and one, who lost his, last November, as the Server Marketing Manager for a ‘Big Iron’ company, has found a new one. Two more people, I know, one being the Managing Director of a high-profile public sector failure, have emailed me, asking if I know of any opportunities and a second Managing Director of a well-known IT services company, has gone on zero salary to set an example, having cut 60% of his staff this year. “Nobody is buying or making decisions” he said and he deals with some of the largest companies in the city.

I could go on but it’s a catalogue of despair and fails to suggest any reason why people might expect an upturn in the market this quarter. A year ago, I recall there were other survey’s which suggested that mid-2002 would show signs of recovery and if you’ve seen any sign of this, please let me know.

From time to time, I’m told that people in government dip into this column, so if you’re reading it today, I can tell you that I’m being asked why this bloodletting in the IT industry isn’t showing through in the unemployment figures? Worse still perhaps, are the consequences for the government’s corporation tax revenues. There’s a not so hidden recession at work here, the country is floating on an ocean of debt and business confidence, in my experience at least, is falling through the floor.

Meanwhile, government, with the help of the BBC, appears to be trying to balance the predicted shortfall in tax revenues by raising the television license to £112. "It's a tax", agreed the nice young lady in TV licensing when I protested. You may remember that following Jonathan Miller’s well-publicized struggle against the license fee as a violation of his human rights, I asked how it’s possible to reconcile watching television on a PC with the law as it stands. One of our readers, law lecturer, Lindsay Stirton, who saw my earlier “Thought for the Day”, is challenging his students to determine whether the BBC’s RealMedia streamed Newsnight show is a television programme, because the identical content is also broadcast to air as a television programme?

Turning the argument around on its head and with a million people now allegedly using broadband Internet access, perhaps government should simply scrap the East-enders tax and consider taxing Internet access instead?. This isn’t as crazy as it sounds. After all, I have two TV licenses and have to own a radio license for my small aircraft.

I would like to think that ultimately, public protest and common-sense will prevail over the continued existence of that sinister Orwellian legacy, the television license and by then, at least 60% of the UK population will be on the World Wide Web.

Lindsay Stirton comments "Reading this article, what is interesting is the claim that 'it's a tax' may be significant, because in UK constitutional theory only Parliament (and not the Minister for Culture, Media and Sport nor the BBC) can levy taxes. There is a legal difference between taxes and charges. But the more the regulations broaden the definition of 'television receiving equipment' to include internet-enabled pcs, the more it starts to look like a tax in the constitutional sense".

"Complicating the matter further, there is a category known as a 'revenue claim' which is broader than a tax. Revenue claims of one state are not enforceable within another state. Could this be why the BBC only require UK-based surfers to get a TV license to watch Paxman with RealPlayer?".


For all the generous political talk of a digital Britain and a wired society there’s a huge cost involved to the Treasury in achieving the changes that now surround us. Historically, new inventions are taxed, directly or indirectly when they achieve a critical mass, so why should the Internet be any different? After all, if of all the nations on earth, we need a license to watch Tom & Jerry, why shouldn’t this form of extortion be extended to the PC, which can also double as a receiver?

Maybe they have thought about it but they aren’t ready to share their conclusions with us quite yet!

What do you think?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…