Skip to main content
Stand Up & Be Counted

You’re not making many friends”, I was told last week, referring of course to my most recent comments on IT procurement and in particular, the story on the health service email project.

I suppose, it’s really a question of how one defines ‘friends’. The CW360 mail bag has been attracting interesting and supportive letters from vendors, civil servants and doctors. I’ve even been asked along to the European Parliament, to chat with the commissioner and some MEPs in November but there’s a suggestion that other ‘friends in high places’ aren’t too impressed with my ‘King’s new clothes argument’.

What the mailbag tells me, is that people working at the leading edge of the larger public sector IT projects are concerned and as one distinguished source wrote “Public-sector PFI and outsourcing contracts need some radical new, professional re-engineering if they are to continue." Another reader with public sector responsibility commented: “After sitting and watching for some time I am just about to start asking questions. Your article seems to support my line of questioning.”

I plan to keep this particular ‘Thought for the Day’ brief. My intention is not to attack any particular government minister, department or strategy, because my experience and quite possibly your own, tells me that the great machine would simply roll into a state of denial and like Martin Sixsmith, I would find myself suddenly consigned to the lunatic fringe of journalism.

One of my academic friends, involved in eGovernment failures around the world, has concluded: “it emerged that failure can have benefits: but only if those around the project can learn from that failure”. I would argue that in the UK, there is little evidence that we are learning from our mistakes and instead and from what our readers are telling me, we are throwing ever-increasing sums of public money at projects of dubious value.

I’ve asked before and I’ll ask again. It’s time that the entire public sector process was reviewed in an effort to determine whether there is a better, more manageable, more accountable and more cost-effective means of rolling-out ‘Big’ ICT projects. Even a 10% saving on costs would represent an astronomical sum, which might even help towards achieving an appointment with my local GP inside ten days or a little more money for books in school.

The system we have in place today is in urgent reform. We are not a rich country and we can’t afford to waste what public money we have on technology which isn’t cost effective of fit for purpose.

I want to hear what you think about this. Am I on the fringe or too close to the truth?


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …