Skip to main content
A Secret Mission in Uncharted Space

Attending Symantec’s Vision 360 summit in London at the end of last week left me with several observations.

The big yellow box company was using the event to launch its new “Integrated Security Management System” to potential and existing Enterprise customers and bought in some big guns, in the shape of NISCC’s Steve Cummings and Sir Andrew Wood, the former British Ambassador to Russia, to help Symantec COO John Schwarz articulate the company’s latest approach to keeping the lid on a growing global information security problem.

For Schwarz there are many different problems tugging at his development team and above them all, “The sheer complexity – of increasingly blended threats – creating an unmanageable situation for most of us”. He compared the present, disjointed state of the industry with the early days of Client-server computing, pointing out, that different generations shared a systems management challenge in common. In such complex and increasingly multiple device-type environments we’re surrounded by “Dozens of highly specialized ‘point’ products that don’t communicate”.

You might think of this condition as a kind of ‘points failure’ and with statistics suggesting confidence in corporate information security to be rather less than that in Railtrack, solving the systems management problem, in the wider security sense is, as Microsoft’s Chief Security Officer, Stuart Okin, would agree, a fundamental problem to be overcome.

As you might expect, Symantec has, what it believes to be a new solution to this a ‘Tower of Babel Effect’ of the industry’s own making and I’m sure they’ll tell you about it if you ask. Just as interesting perhaps, from my point of view, is how, in the space of eighteen months, the company whose strategy was once derided as “a blizzard of yellow boxes”, has suddenly emerged, almost unchallenged as the dominant player in the Enterprise security space.

Undoubtedly, the other security giants will point to the latest Gartner or IDC report on who offers the best anti virus solution or who happens to be strongest at the perimeter of the network. Symantec however, through a number of swift acquisitions and a ‘Buzz Lightyear’ style, is attracting the attention of both business and the public sector with a mix of clever marketing and brand management. It strikes me that Symantec and Enterprise security are becoming increasingly synonymous and unless the other players’ sit-up and pay attention, the lucrative Enterprise security and managed services space could find itself wrapped-up inside a series of yellow box solutions.

Does that matter? I don’t think so because what this sector of the industry needs is more professionalism and the tighter product integration that John Schwarz describes. What remains to be seen is whether companies like Symantec which started in the security ‘commodity’ space, can succeed and thrive in the same managed services space as companies such as Unisys and IBM.


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…