Skip to main content
Use Invisible Ink

Quite unused to sensible comments on matters of technology from anywhere in the vicinity of Westminster, I was quite surprised to have seen two MPs, from opposite sides of the House, in the space of a single week, actually introduce useful arguments involving IT and its legislation.

First it was Labour MP, Derek Wyatt, who, after reading ‘Thought for the Day’ on the rising Spam plague, told me that he now plans to start a lobby group to campaign against this rapidly growing and seemingly unavoidable menace, responsible for clogging up our in-boxes with the worst kind of intrusive behavior.
Hard on the heels of Mr. Wyatt, comes Tory MP Michael Fabricant, who has reached the welcome conclusion that reading other people’s email, even if they happen to be your employees, just isn’t on.

In the wake of the RIP legislation, a new software industry has grown-up around an unrestricted license to snoop and only last month, a company released a thinly-disguised ‘Trojan’ product, aimed at Hotmail accounts, which for only $99 can invisibly forward all Hotmail and Instant Messaging traffic back to a third-party’s account.

While employers may have a legitimate interest, in very special circumstances, to intercept private email correspondence or even telephone calls, I believe that the emphasis has swung too far towards giving business ‘Carte Blanche’ to trawl at will. Personal privacy is a concept which has become increasingly threatened under this government and a new survey has revealed that one in five companies now monitors employees on a daily basis. Such news makes me increasingly apprehensive over the speed at which we appear to be embracing a ‘Big Brother’ society, a worry which is obviously shared by Michael Fabricant, who wishes to afford the same protection in law to email as exists for telephone calls and the post.

Whether either MP can exert influence over these two separate problems, is open to question. Spam is a global annoyance and email doesn’t respect EEC legislation, so cutting-off the Spam at source may be an impossible task. The solution can only lie in better and more powerful filtering and whose responsibility, I wonder, should that be?
And as for reading other people’s email, I very much doubt that this government would entertain any legislation that would encourage vigorous debate over the question of personal privacy; in the workplace or anywhere else. If one happens to follow the work of Privacy International or The Foundation for Information Policy Research, then it becomes abundantly clear, that thanks in part to a fear of terrorism and the introduction of new technology, we are losing civil liberties at Internet speed.

So don’t expect any sudden changes in the law. Stay at home, hide under a duvet and write your letters in invisible ink!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…