Skip to main content
There's a Hole in My Bucket..!

Microsoft makes mistakes. It’s a statement that many of us would take for granted but to hear it suggested by Stuart Okin, Microsoft’s Chief Security Office (CSO) in the UK, was enough to grab my interest.

Following my column on Palladium, Microsoft’s forthcoming security architecture, Stuart had invited me over to the Reading campus for lunch and a chat. More used to being beaten about the head with marketing slogans from a company in denial, I found Stuart’s argument in support of Microsoft’s latest security initiative, more lucid than anything I have heard to date.

Microsoft, it appears, is prepared to move heaven and earth to in its efforts to create a trusted computing environment. The company accepts that it still has a long way to go before it can win the level confidence that it would like from its customers. Microsoft can’t promise perfect security – can anyone? - but I’m told that it can promise steadily improving security and Stuart Okin is convinced that the ‘Trusted Computing’ strategy, launched by Bill Gates earlier in the year, is already beginning to show encouraging results.

That’s very nice, I hear you say, Microsoft has learned to spell ‘Trust’ as opposed to ‘Anti-trust’ but how much of this is hot air and how much of it can really be demonstrated in overall improvements and security enhancements to the Microsoft product line?

Stuart Okin tells me that there’s much to be positive about, even though this is very much work in progress; a kind of “Every day and in every way we’re getting better and better” mantra. He asks me what I think the company needs to do to win back confidence. The problem, I tell him, revolves around honest computing as much as trusted computing. I can’t think of anyone I know who would use honest in the same breath as Microsoft. Clever, perhaps but like the canny politician it is, Microsoft is defined by its voting record; great software and good with children but short on trust, the software kind of course. How, I ask, can we really be sure that this simply isn’t a huge public relations effort to keep the lid on the secure computing issue for as long as it possibly can?

All Microsoft can do, suggests Okin, is ask the world to look closely at the evidence. How rapidly the company is making improvements and dealing with problems when they occur. Surprisingly and to prove the willingness of the company, he offers me open and unrestricted access to the Microsoft security team, allowing me draw my own conclusions from what Microsoft is doing to build security into the software, rather than speculate on what I might think it might not be doing about the problem.

So, should I accept his invitation and go looking for the evidence? If I do will I emerge with my cynicism intact or will I return wearing a Microsoft t-shirt and a fixed grin, quietly mumbling ‘Every day and every way we’re doing better and better’?


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …