Skip to main content
Safe as Houses

I don’t know about you but in the same week that the United States launched it cyber-defense plan, I’m receiving junk email from an operation calling itself the “AMERICAN BIO-THREAT

INFO LINE”, is, for the price of a premium rate telephone call, offering “Get the Facts!!! Know the Causes, Symptoms & Treatments of: Anthrax, Cholera, Smallpox, Ebola, Typhoid Fever, Salmonella Botulism and Much More!!!”

It comes as no surprise that the Americans don’t realize that we have a National Health Service and that most, if not all of the above diseases and indeed, many more, can be found, completely free of charge, in any London casualty unit.. However, this does illustrate that regardless of doom-laden warnings of the collapse of the US national infrastructure, as a consequence of a cyber-attack, people, over there at least, are far more worried about decidedly low-tech threats

At least the Americans have a cyber-defense plan. We have one of sorts, I know, because I have been involved in a number of meeting on the subject and have met Howard Schmidt, several times, the Vice Chairman of the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board and one of the architects of the US domestic strategy. But this is England and as you would expect, our own cyber-defense measures reflect the Dunkirk spirit and involve the cooperation of a number of different agencies. How this works in practice isn’t immediately obvious and I recall that Howard and Robert Miller, the Deputy Director of the US Department of Commerce, were attempting to grasp the intracacies when I met them shortly after 911.

The real problem for government, ours or theirs, is that the infrastructure that runs the technology is owned by private enterprise, so anything beyond encouragement would be counter-productive. As a consequence, the US government is asking business to make cyber-security an integrated part of any commercial operation in a manner that almost mandates the existence of a security policy, something that a good 60% of companies in the UK still don’t have.

But once the applause has died down and the politicians have returned to their constituencies feeling a little safer from the imagined threat of suicide hackers, the truth sinks in. Nothing has really changed and responsibilities are as vague and as voluntary as they ever were.

Back on this side of the pond, we aren’t so obsessed with the threat of hackers wreaking havoc on our critical infrastructure, as after all, we have RailTrack, the Health Service and The London Underground to worry about first. The reality is that you can have a cyber-defense plan, which involves the hardening of critical systems in the public sector but outside of this, any initiative can’t really be much better than the public-service broadcasts made in the sixties against the threat of nuclear weapons. “Wrap yourself in brown paper and hide under the kitchen table”.

Now the Americans have set an example of kinds, the DTI should at least start encouraging businesses in our brave new Broadband Britain to start taking the issue of cyber-security more seriously than their own figures suggest they are. While I don’t think we need our own homeland security Czar it’s time for government to start making the right noises about securing the Knowledge Economy.

Meanwhile, if you think you might have anthrax, you’ll have to wait ten days for a doctor’s appointment like everyone else in SW19.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…