Skip to main content
More Damned than Indicted

They might call it a new chapter in the ‘Trusted Computing’ story but it appears that Microsoft has been rather more than economical with the truth, the US Federal Trade Commission revealed on Friday.

Of course, I don’t know anyone over the age of seven, who really believed – hand on heart – that the company were being 100% truthful when they made security promises around Passport but it took a complaint from complaint from a consortium of consumer groups led Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) to reveal the true extent of the ‘porkies’ that the company was prepared to feed its customers.

According to the Commission's complaint, Microsoft “falsely represented” that:

- It employs reasonable and appropriate measures under the circumstances to maintain and protect the privacy and confidentiality of consumers' personal information collected through its Passport and Passport Wallet services, including credit card numbers and billing information stored in Passport Wallet;

- Purchases made with Passport Wallet are generally safer or more secure than purchases made at the same site without Passport Wallet when, in fact, most consumers received identical security at those sites regardless of whether they used Passport Wallet to complete their transactions;

- Passport did not collect any personally identifiable information other than that described in its privacy policy when, in fact, Passport collected and held, for a limited time, a personally identifiable sign-in history for each user; and

- The Kids Passport program provided parents control over what information participating Web sites could collect from their children

There’s more of course and the proposed consent order prohibits any misrepresentation of information practices in connection with Passport and other similar services. The order also requires Microsoft to implement and maintain a comprehensive information security program, which would really be quite funny to read if it wasn’t so sad to see in print. In addition, Microsoft must have its security program certified as meeting or exceeding the standards in the consent order by an independent professional every two years.

Once again, the vexing question of ‘Corporate Responsibility’ rears its ugly head and that Microsoft is involved comes a s no great surprise to many people. Does anyone really expect large corporations to tell the truth anymore? Yes and No. In reality, I believe the best intention of honesty in business certainly exists but that the Directors, particularly where security is concerned, simply don’t know if they are telling the truth or not and the same argument applies to Government as well.

Information security and the question of its integrity is invariably a delegated and highly technical responsibility. While the CEO of a company might make a promise that your information is safe in his hands, his software technology or information security policy might not be up to the task. Further down the ladder of responsibility, nobody dares contradict the Blairs, Elllisons and Balmers of this world and they hear only what they want to hear until the FTC arrives at the door. It’s ‘Reality Vertigo’ in every sense.

Meanwhile, rumours are circulating that another big name in the industry might be receiving a visit from the Federal authorities in what could be another huge scandal in the making. If you listen carefully, you might even be able to hear the sound of the shredders hard at work over the sounds of aircraft taking off at Heathrow.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…