Skip to main content
No Sex Please – We’re British

It appears that a quarter of UK companies have sacked employees for misconduct involving peeking at online pornography over the Internet, according to a survey from Websens and that 72% of businesses have had to address the uncomfortable reality of Internet abuse or should I call that misuse?

So hands-up anyone who hasn’t ever browsed an “unsuitable” Web site? If this were France or Italy of course, readers would immediately fill the mailbag with their favourites but we’re British, which is why our politicians hide, rather than celebrate their mistresses.

Of course, one problem lies in avoiding sex on the Internet. My Hotmail inbox this morning had eleven emails, even with the spam filter turned-on. One was legitimate correspondence, three were loan offers, four were junk and four were ‘solicitations’ of one kind or another. Increasingly, the latter arrive as HTML, with embedded pictures, so regardless of whether I wish to view a ‘sample’ or not, I can still see it.

Less frequently, a link to what you think is one thing, happens to take you to an entirely different place, which then kicks of a ‘porn storm’ of sex-site windows, as referred to by Edwina’s mother, in the TV comedy, ‘Absolutely Fabulous’.

And then there are site such as Orsm. Awfully popular and its model aeroplane collection makes Playboy look tame but it carries, from time to time, some of the funniest video clips to download, like the Jay Leno “Wassup” Budweiser sketch, featuring Osama Bin Laden and the Taleban.

Naturally, one can’t have people wasting their time browsing photographs of Angelina Jolie’s more attractive features or passing these around the office for the admiration or the embarrassment of colleagues, male and female alike, which is why filtering software is increasingly popular. Even worse of course, is the prospect of an office server being used as repository and distribution point for paedophile collections, a nightmare scenario for any business, which has happened more than once.

Once again, it all comes down to a question of policy and probity. On several occasions over the last three years, I have had to pen and reinforce company policy on web browsing and inappropriate content and this is a difficult issue for each and every employer attached to the Internet. What is acceptable and what is not? Do you forbid flesh tones altogether – which is difficult to monitor and enforce - or do you specify that saving and distributing ‘pornographic images represents unacceptable behaviour?

If 72% of businesses have a problem then its time that employers ‘Came out of the closet’ and started to think clearly and logically about the problem and how best to protect their business interests and those of their staff at the same time. Being British, we are inclined to shrug off the ‘S’ word until it becomes an unavoidable problem in the workplace and I can tell you, that the latest statistics show quite clearly that pornographic Spam now represents the fastest growing nuisance on the Web.

In the interests of setting a good example, I can’t of course browse the more interesting websites from the comfort of my office network, however important my research. I plan instead to advertise for an Italian mistress!


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…