Skip to main content
Wave Goodbye to Privacy
Two years have passed since I gave a speech at “The Internet & Power” conference at Cambridge, where I warned that the threat of a new Act of Parliament, “The Regulation of Investigatory Powers”, would drive the final nail into any illusion of freedom left to us.

In a grand rhetorical gesture, I said “What began with Magna Carta, ends with RIP” and the Act was highly controversial when it was first presented to Parliament, resulting in defeats for the Government in the Lords and significant changes being made to prevent its complete rejection.

Now, I don’t care much for political rants and the opinions of left or even right wing loonies. I much prefer common sense and in most cases, believe that mixing government and technology is a recipe for the worst kinds of embarrassment and disaster. But RIP is a special case, because what many of us feared most seems to be about to happen, as the Act is amended to increase the number of official bodies that can access personal details of phone calls and emails.

Originally the powers were only available to the police, customs, Inland Revenue, and the security services but FIPR (The Foundation for information Policy Research) is now warning that amendments will extend this power to other government departments, local authorities, the NHS and apparently even as far as your postman, through the Post Office.- Consignia.

According to The FIPR, “The powers contained in RIP Part I Chapter II allow notices to be served on telephone companies, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) or postal operators to obtain information such as the name and address of users, phone numbers called, source and destination of emails, the identity of web sites visited or mobile phone location data accurate to a hundred metres or less”.

Ian Brown, the Director of FIPR has remarked that the difficulty that the Government has encountered in getting the right processes in place for the police should make us ultra-cautious in extending these powers to such a wide range of bodies, with little enough resources put into the oversight arrangements for the current proposals. In practice, these bodies are going to obtain this personal data on anyone they wish, without any effective way of checking what they're doing.

I would like to believe that post-911, RIP will be exercises sensibly and with appropriate restraint but then I would like to believe the same thing about my local council’s unrestricted use of traffic wardens, who might, to play the complete cynic, also qualify as “authorized officials”.

I do wonder sometimes whether there’s a new ‘Reformation’ at work in this country of ours with the Internet and not the Bible as the blunt instrument of social change. We might have David Starkey’s ‘Life of Henry VIII’ to entertain us in the evenings but sadly, in our apathetic and hurried digital age, we have no modern equivalent of Sir Thomas More, a powerful enough figure prepared to lucidly defend the remains of our freedoms on a matter of principle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…