Skip to main content
Not Out But In

If it happens to be Monday and you’re not reading this, then perhaps it’s because the Internet has collapsed.

Of course this has nothing to do with hackers or a sinister attack on our national infrastructure and everything to do with KPNQwest, which handles nearly half of Europe's Internet traffic, sliding into bankruptcy last week. The company is threatening to pull the plug unless it’s creditors settle their debts, by close of play today, Friday, I suppose, a remote possibility, given that I’m the only person left at my desk and everyone else is watching England playing Argentina, surrounded by empty cans of Lager.

Now, if you happen to be an AOL or a Freeserve subscriber, then it’s quite possible that you’re looking at a blank screen now and if you’re not, then you should be surprised and relieved simultaneously.

And on another European note, and as expected, The European Parliament has voted to make the sending of unsolicited email ‘Spam’ illegal. This won’t actually pass into law until next year and ‘cookies’ have been saved from being banned under the same legislation but it does rather leave one isolated nation hanging off the edge of Europe, fighting bravely alone for the right to have its citizens spammed by tedious offers of Swedish furniture, personal massage services and the kind of sleaze that deserves a personal invitation to tea at No10.

As I briefly pause to delete a Spam message that has just dropped into my mailbox from mattgerche@euol.com I can say with confidence that CW360 has clearly demonstrated that its readers don’t wish to be spammed and hold strong views on the dithering that inflicts this sordid plague upon everyone using the Internet. When the subject of Spam is discussed privately, I find that people in Government are clearly embarrassed and agree that ‘Opting in’ is the more sensible solution than ‘Opting-out’ but nobody appears to know why on earth, as a nation, we are defending Spam as a legitimate marketing tool and supporting the right of others to continually pester us with the contents of Pandora’s Box.

So Government, will you please accept that if there was a referendum, there be overwhelming support for the banning of unsolicited email and that continued support for principle of ‘Spamming’ suggests that you have lost touch with popular opinion and have little grasp of the productivity costs that Spam imposes on British business, as well as the danger that it presents to the younger and more vulnerable parts of our society.

Ban Spam or at least tell us why you believe we shouldn’t and why an ‘Opt-out’ policy is in the public interest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…