Skip to main content
My Left Foot

“Why” said Jeremy Paxman, “should we be bothered by this RIP Act? After all, unless you’ve something to hide, you’re not going to be worried by the prospect of government reading your email”.

It was a Wednesday night, ‘Newsnight’ in fact and the BBC had invited me to take part in the programme’s lead story, The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act. All of a sudden and prompted by the Guardian’s front page revelation, the media had woken-up to the news that the infamous RIPA was to be extended, perhaps even to traffic wardens, a tongue in cheek comment, that Newsnight picked-up.

Mr. Paxman needed some convincing and at first, he didn’t recognize the legislation as a gross invasion of privacy and violation of our civil rights. My own role that evening, other than offering him a brief, was to take part in a three way discussion with a Home Office Minister but time and the Minister’s reluctance to participate in such a very public and live debate, left me spectating from the sideline and the politician exposed to Paxman’s tender mercies. Under pressure from the inimitable Jeremy, the Minister was made to look like a Stalinist goon with two left feet, who just couldn’t avoid kicking the ball into the back of the Home Office net every couple of minutes. I’m sure the Home Secretary will think twice before sending one of his deputies to depend the indefensible in future.

If the cynical Paxman could be persuaded that RIPA is an unbelievably stupid piece of legislation then there’s always hope that someone nearer the top of the political tree might wonder why on earth we’ve got this far in the ‘Mother of Parliaments’. As one expert on the legislation suggested to me, ‘RIPA is an example of a ‘catch-all’ piece of legislation. The Government is attempting to rush through an Act which sweeps up any conceivable evolution in communications technology. They tried this with CCTV to reduce crime and it failed miserably and they’ll do the same thing with the Internet, which will fail equally miserably”.

If Government is going to obsess about the Internet, there are other, equally pressing areas, which I believe, should be attracting more attention. The other day, while reading a story on terrorism, I followed a link to a page on how the FBI had forced one popular US website to remove a video of the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. The hyperlink sent me to a site which broadcasts the darkest and most disgusting images of human misery and depravity. Foolishly, my own curiosity encouraged me to open the MPEG file of the ‘execution’; the decapitation of a young Russian soldier by a Chechen guerilla with a kitchen knife. It’s an image of bloody horror that will haunt me and yet it’s one that your child or mine can just as easily find and share in seconds.

Where should our priorities be I wonder? Snooping on every citizen’s email or wondering whether the ‘right’ to leverage the Internet as a medium for free speech and free expression has gone too far?


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…