Skip to main content
Predictions - Who Can Say?

The wonderful thing about being in the predictions business is that one is rarely right in anticipating what one knows about most and uncannily accurate at guessing the future of things on the periphery of one's experience.

Of course, I have my own parallel universe theories, some tarot cards and a bag of rune stones that I use when I really want to surprise myself.

I should add, though, that flipping a coin is as good a way as any for predicting IBM's or Sun's results this year.

My bookcase has an interesting collection of "classics" going back to the earlier years of computing. There's Re-engineering the Corporation and Paradigm Shift, Release 3.0 and even an original Bill Gates' The Road Ahead, sitting next to Under the Radar, by Bob Young of Red Hat.

One of the more interesting books is Dvorak Predicts, by the US columnist, John Dvorak, whose big prediction is that "Microsoft's domination will come to an abrupt end".

"One bad quarter and the bloom is off Microsoft stock". "When the boom ends, Microsoft will be just another software company and Lotus will re-emerge as a leader in the spreadsheet and Groupware category".

Lets face it, he speculates, "DOS is dead and Windows NT won't really catch on and OS/2 will still give it a run for its money."

With almost 200 pages of nostalgia, it's really hard to pick the best predictions. There's:

Strong OS/2 usage will confuse the market

Unix will never become a mainstream operating system

Windows for Workgroups is Microsoft's long-term strategy

DEC will take Microsoft to the next level

NT is a smokescreen operating system

RISC will win

The Pentium will mark the end of the line for the 80x86 family

The TV and the computer won't merge

There'll be a backlash against personal devices


He does get close sometimes, identifying Unix as a target for Windows NT.

Unfortunately, Dvorak is more way out than way on, but big corporations will pay good money for this kind of crystal ball-gazing.
So am I going to predict the next ten years? Not on your life. I think Windows will be "big" and that IBM will still be around.

There'll be a few big hardware manufacturers and software will be something that exists in the device and several other places at the same time through Web services.

Technology will never be cheap and I will still have to ask my daughter to show me how to use the home entertainment "hub".

Winston Churchill once said: "I always avoid prophesying beforehand, because it is much better policy to prophesy after the event has already taken place."

Perhaps we so-called IT experts should heed his advice.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…