Skip to main content
New Technology but Old Methods

eBusiness is THE game blares the latest IBM advertisement on the television in front of me. My wife wonders why I laugh.

Customer Relationship Management (CRM). We all know about it and many companies spend a fortune on the software that goes with it but why, I ask, do those who need it most, never seem to use it?

Let’s take Parcel Force or should I call it ‘Parcel Farce’. We all suspect, I’m sure, that a First Class letter is only marginally quicker than a message in a bottle and that second class mail is sorted in Kabul before being lost in Reading but you would at least expect the Post Office or Consignia, as it’s now called, to recognise a valid London postcode.

There must be a deep personal experience at the heart of this column you might be thinking and you’d be right.

Somewhere between California and Mitcham there is a £1000 package on its way to me. I know it’s on its way, because the American supplier “Cutting Edge Technology”, has told me, because it’s their second attempt to send it to me. First time around, two weeks ago, the package reached Mitcham and although it had my name, address, postcode and telephone number on the package in large letters, it was returned to California, much the worse for wear as an unknown London address.

Now my address is the only street of its name in London, which is quite remarkable. In fact, if you type in my full SW19 postcode into Streetmap.co.uk, you can even see an aerial picture of my patio roof and whether my car is in its drive.

Parcel Force has a 0800 service number with a recorded message that insists its agents are looking after other customers and that you should please use the Web site or call later. It then disconnects the call to reinforce the point.

The www.parcelforce.co.uk website offers a rudimentary tracking agent, which yes, tells you that the package - if you happen to have the consignment reference from the obligingly friendly American side of the exercise – is on the UK system and en route. But you knew that already and it’s hardly up to Fedex global positioning standards.

To be really awkward, what you might want to know as a customer is whether it’s en route to you or en route back to the States for a second time because our sad excuse for a postal system is unable to put in place anything that even remotely resembles an efficient business process or useful CRM system.

I did manage to find out a week ago, that the package was on a guaranteed four day delivery, so my best guess for its whereabouts remains the black hole of Mitcham but how, I wonder, do I actually find out where it is and even why they chose to turn it right around to California on the first attempt?

Oh, and by the way, when I do receive a letter telling me that they have the package, it's cash only for the duty, so I have to drive across Mitcham to London to retrieve it, during working hours of course.

Isn’t this what .Net and the Internet revolution is all about? Are so many of our older and larger companies and institutions, like the Post Office, the railways and the Inland Revenue so bogged down by bureaucracy and mediocrity that they are unable to build useful customer interfaces and services from the vast sums they spend on new technology?

We have this collective vision of a ‘Wired Society’. Joined-up government, UK-Online, e-this and e-that. The problem is that the bad old ways of doing business are still alive and well and all the money in the world spent on customer relationship training and software makes very little difference to our lives when we have to deal with the everyday companies like BT and Consignia. it strikes me, that companies of this size and reputations are likely to take Microsoft’s ‘One Degree of Separation’ slogan literally where their customers are concerned. Perhaps it should be “One More Excuse for Separation” instead.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…