Skip to main content
It's Trust that Makes the World Go Round

Bill Gates says it's time to learn to trust your computer.

Well, I love my computer, if you can call it love, but I don't trust it and I don't think I ever will.

This is because however advanced and impressive the technology, computers, in my experience, remain as fallible as ever. Like people, they have a habit of letting you down when you need them most.

If I appear mildly cynical, it's because all the technology in the world has rather let me down today and I've just missed my flight home from Dubai.

And if anyone happens to know where my e-mails are going, let me know, because I certainly don't.

Reliability and trust are, however, two very different ideals for those of us sitting with PCs in front of us. But most systems are reliable most of the time and life is no longer the unhappy lottery it once was with Windows 3.1 and its frequent "Unexpected Applications Errors".

Granted, then, that PCs work most of the time. Trust is, however, a different matter. Trusted computing does, of course, imply security or, at least, something resembling environmental integrity. It's something Microsoft has never been particularly good at in the past but plans to excel at in the future.

Sitting out here in the Middle East, trusted computing needs to be at the top of everyone's agenda, a message I've been giving governments and business in the region.

If you're going to have e-commerce and e-government, then these have to be built upon an infrastructure of trust, rather than simply the promise of better-than-average connectivity, "security first" being the operative sentiment.

The elusive problem lies in achieving end-to-end trust within an IT infrastructure, regardless of whether your business happens to sit in Riyadh or Reading.

So Microsoft can discover "trusted computing" in much the same way as it discovered networking and then, a little later, the Internet, but it's debatable whether such an overdue sense of evangelism will really do much more than encourage people to think more clearly about the risks associated with using Windows.

Over time, Microsoft products will present a much harder nut to crack, but it's going to take another three to five years before what's already out in the market and, in particular, the less developed world, is going to be replaced by more secure iterations of Windows XP and beyond.

So while the message from Mr Gates appears sensible, we all need to see evidence that skyrocketing cybercrime is on the decline and that business is putting a security policy first, rather than last, on its list of priorities.

Many of us are still far from feeling trust in Microsoft, but let's give the company 12 months to start proving that it can make a difference, or whether this is simply another marketing daydream.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…