Skip to main content
It’s All About ‘E’

Internet threat to 800,000 in public jobs”, screams the editorial in the Sunday Times. “e-Envoy says that a fifth of public servants could lose their jobs over the next ten years because the Internet will make them redundant”.

After a long sleep, it seems that the Sunday Times and indeed, the Public Sector unions, may have just woken-up to the arrival of ‘Disintermediation’ and The Information Society? Take the banking sector as an example. First there was the arrival of ATM machines in the eighties and with them, came the opportunity to dramatically downsize the workforce. Then came the arrival of on-line banking and banking became leaner still, with some, like Egg, disappearing into cyber-space completely.

Eventually, most of the high-street banks will disappear, mine already has, and only those customers with acceptable credit ratings and Internet access, will have access to ‘The Bank that likes to say yes’.

What happens, I wonder, when the promise of Broadband Britain becomes a distinct reality and the greater part of the population starts ordering their supermarket shopping direct from Tesco.Com? Where will the tens of thousands of people now working on the checkout counters find work? Perhaps one day, there will only be two kinds of job available, either you’re a knowledge worker or a parking warden.

The world has changed around us in the space of less than twenty years and while technology may make our lives a little smoother, it also threatens to make the contribution of millions of relatively unskilled people irrelevant.

Twenty years ago, 43% of employment was in businesses with more than five hundred people. By the beginning of the last decade it was 34% and at the turn of the millennium, it was approximately 27%.

The question of ‘streamlining’ the public sector is an uncomfortable question for many governments now pursuing their different ‘e’ agendas. Most if not all governments, those like Brazil, Greece and Kuwait, have a vision of what technology can achieve in replacing tedious, inefficient and costly public services, replacing them with a citizens Web page and a transaction engine, linked across multiple government departments. The ideal state is of course close to invisible government, friendly, sterile, efficient and fully automated at the same time and when it works, much like Internet banking, the people wonder how they ever managed without it.

But in many countries across the world, the public sector represents a home for the over-qualified and the long-term unemployable. In others, mostly English-speaking countries, a process of streamlining, has been producing an increasingly thinner and frequently overworked and technology-dependent public-sector for the last two decades.

How many of us would wish to turn back the clock and return to a time of queuing at the local branch of a bank to withdraw money or pay a telephone bill? How many of us would breathe a sigh of relief if we never had to visit another Post Office again to queue interminably to pay our road tax?

Institutions matter but not in any nostalgic sense. As a society we need to better understand where “joined-up” government is leading, rather than agonise too much over what it might be replacing.


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…