Skip to main content
Ask Not for Whom the Bell Tolls

The stock market needed a boost and this week, a universal sigh of relief accompanied Cisco’s “better than expected results”, it’s first year-on-year quarterly revenue rise for over twelvemonths and since it announced massive workforce cuts and rationalised it’s free soft drinks policy in a bid to cut costs.

Cisco is, of course a ‘Bellwether’ stock and I comment on it quite frequently on CNBC. However, before we start getting really excited and talk prematurely about ‘recovery’ in the tech-sector, I’ll grab my little green notebook and flick back through the pages to a few weeks ago to the programme that followed Microsoft’s earnings results. Then, I said that:

“Sun is flat, Microsoft is disappointing, IBM is wobbling and Compaq barely made it”.

On top of this, SAP had a 40% drop in income for the quarter and we won’t even talk about the telecoms stocks. It wouldn’t be kind.

Cisco could afford to be a little buoyant at its performance. It had, after all, avoided crucifixion and single-handedly took the Wall Street back over the Dow Jones 10,000 mark. In the words of Cisco’s CEO, John Chambers, “: "Last year was a classic downturn. We took the critical steps to position ourselves for the upturn, and we are beginning to see the very positive results."

The market is however looking for hope, any hope and now it will be looking for evidence that Cisco’s recovery is rather more than a blip of optimism in a rather desolate landscape. Cisco and others like it, such as Foundry Networks represent the foundation of the DotCom effect and the vision of a broadband-driven universe, which has yet to arrive. Unfortunately though, my innate cynicism and the only too visible tech-stock bloodbath that I see around me, leads me to think that it’s far too early for people to talk of any real recovery. We need to see at least three companies come out with strong results before we start breaking out the champagne. Dell is one, Cisco of course is another and a third might be Microsoft or IBM. Judging this highly volatile market on a single encouraging performance is far too risky and most certainly premature, in my mind.

I can’t see a single company that I know of in this industry, which isn’t suffering. There is business to be had, particularly in the public sector but much of the time, IT companies’ largest customers are other IT companies and so the recession we are trapped in goes around in an unhappy circle, one which has created a condition where we can’t find two or three IT companies able to offer the market enough good news simultaneously, to jumpstart confidence and revive the march of progress.

There’s light at the end of the tunnel somewhere for the IT business but for many IT companies, it’s just as likely to be a train coming from the other direction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…