Skip to main content
An Uneasy Revolution

There’s a danger that the National Audit Office report on our progress towards eGovernment, will be seen as a big finger being waved at everyone involved in the development of the ‘UK-Online’ agenda.

The UK is no different to any of the other countries I have visited over the last two years in trying to meet the cultural challenges associated with an ambitious and constantly evolving eGovernment programme, Accepting the vision, as one Greek Minister told me, is the easy part, reforming the civil service takes a little longer!

My own experience appears to support the view that there’s a resource gap between vision and execution in this country. Some would call it a gulf. When, last year, I chaired a roundtable at the eGovernment conference in London, some thirty local authorities, offered me one-line messages to deliver to The Office of The e-Envoy. These varied considerably between:

“Tell the e-Envoy that it’s all fur coat and no knickers” to “Most of here have day jobs. We need to spend less time thinking of clever ways to satisfy Whitehall’s paper targets and more time exchanging information and skills with other government departments”

We have to be honest with ourselves in looking at the entire eGovernment programme. This is as much about social re-engineering and good practise as it is about paying for your road tax on-line. In this country, government suffocates us with procedures and paperwork and at last, a conscious decision has been made to find a more efficient and cost-effective way of presenting, managing and facilitating some five hundred different services that touch us as citizens.

It is this breadth of vision and ambition which makes the UK’s own eGovernment programme so interesting to other countries with more modest targets in mind and in this case, being at the leading edge of eGovernment can mean that we are at its bleeding edge as well.

The Office of The e-Envoy is valiantly standardising the greater part of what is required to help central and local government departments on-line (there’s the e-Government Interoperability Framework and the e-Government Metadata Framework to name but two) but a project on this scale demands a huge pool of skilled people and an even larger pool of money to carry through the project management and business process re-engineering that the UK’s own eGovernment programme demands. Civil servants have to believe in information age government as much as the politicians and many of the former appear unconvinced, unskilled and unhappy at the extra workload, which is being thrust upon them.

But this is a revolution in the making and while I won’t start quoting Lenin or Marx in support of UK Online, I will paraphrase what I said at a meeting at No10 last month. There’s nothing wrong with the vision but revolutions cost money and are driven more by involvement than by direction. It’s the involvement part of the puzzle that still defeats us, convincing the public sector that it’s part of the UK’s eGovernment revolution rather than part of the resistance.


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…