Skip to main content
Time for a Quick Reality Check

I love Linux, I write about it frequently but ask me to install it and use it in anger and I would be as lost as Jeremy Clarkson on a pair of roller blades.

Last year, Linux finally became respectable and this year, flushed with ambition and support from some of the largest names in the business, it’s in real danger of becoming the universal answer to everything that isn’t Microsoft. That’s not such a bad thing, until you realize that a great many of us, thousands of small businesses throughout the land, still buy our hardware and software from PC World and the very thought of having a sensible conversation about the merits of Linux, let alone being served, makes me break out in a cold sweat.

“Dodgy Web Server, you need Linux mate”. “Know what I mean”?
“Want a cheap Server Appliance then”? “Pick up a Penguin”.

So once more, I’ll climb wearily back into my pulpit and tell anyone who wants to listen that Linux is great but probably not yet ready for you. It’s cheap, it’s reliable, it’s mostly secure and yes, it’s as dull as dishwater to anyone who doesn’t own a wispy beard and a pair of comfy slippers. After all, its principal champion these days is IBM; the Ford Motor Company of the computer world, hell-bent on giving us Linux with all the sex appeal of a Mondeo.

And there you have it. Linux now wears a shirt and tie and is, dare I say it, respectable. But even IBM has yet to find a really clever way of comfortably squeezing the Linux Penguin into a dark blue suit. Rest assured though that IBM is working hard at the problem and to Microsoft’s horror, Linux is starting to chip away at the edges of its very lucrative Server market. On the desktop of course, Microsoft remains in charge. You see, Linux, aside from being a rather good Operating System, represents for many, a lifestyle choice, a quiet protest in an increasingly anodyne world, dominated by a single software super-giant where clever packaging invariably wins over more sentimental principles of Open-Source computing.

If Linux on the client-side just isn’t going to happen outside of niche areas, such as education, the same is true for the smaller Enterprise customer, outside of dabbling with an Apache Web Server. There’s too much pain involved making the thing work. The future for Linux lies increasingly with the evolution of Server Blades and so-called ‘Server Appliances’ and at the end of last year, I warned that the threatened skills crisis facing the industry makes server appliances as much of inevitability as the steady growth of the open-source software movement and the arrival of increasingly cheaper hardware.

As everyone races to join the global networked economy, the demand for component-style simplicity and lower TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) will continue to drive the industry towards more unsophisticated single-purpose server-appliances. This remains an important part of IBM’s own game plan, to catch the next wave of server consolidation for print, file and Web serving by providing Linux-only configurations for its mainframes and midrange servers that carry a lower price tag than the plain vanilla zSeries or iSeries machines without Linux. The company claims that 11% of the mainframe processing power that was shipped in the fourth quarter of 2001 were dedicated to supporting Linux workloads, so there’s no doubt that Linux now has its foot firmly wedged in the door.

Unfortunately in the industry in which we live and work, as adjectives, cheap and sexy are mutually exclusive. The new Apple iMAC is sexy but not cheap and I have yet to come across a cheap and sexy Linux Server appliance. Companies are choosing to evaluate Linux because Linux can save them money, as in the case of one Canadian insurance giant which reportedly saved $20 million by rolling a single Linux Portal solution out through its fourteen subsidiaries.

If Linux offers us a technology argument, it’s also very much a TCO argument too. Businesses are realizing that computing costs are increasingly unsustainable at present levels. Sexy computing is too expensive in the current economic climate and cheap computing has an attractive ring to it. What interests business now is the ‘install and forget’ Appliance Server, the application being powerful and the underlying Operating System invisible. The argument in fact is moving beyond whether Linux will ever be as good as Solaris or Windows 2000 to a question of how cheaply and reliably an application can run on a Linux box as opposed to some other proprietary OS. But until you can walk into PC World and walk out with a Linux Server-appliance to plug seamlessly into you network, Linux is going to remain firmly in its niche, still not quite powerful enough to win the Enterprise Server battle and too intimidating a prospect for most small businesses to consider.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …