Skip to main content
Pass the Cornflakes

It’s like a hanging set to music, except you just know that there’s no real chance that the condemned man, in this case it’s Microsoft, will ever take the drop.

Microsoft is of course threatening to withdraw Windows, if the States get their way, arguing as they are for a component (middleware) version of the product, which will allow for third-party development and licensing. This is nothing less than a look under Microsoft’s bonnet. Just imagine owning a car but weren’t allowed to look at the engine?

That’s the happy world of Windows and always will be if Microsoft has its way. The alternative, claims Microsoft, is nothing less than anarchy, with thousands of Windows clones washing around, all slightly different and where middleware from Microsoft would be forced to co-exist alongside midddleware from rival companies, such as Sun or even Oracle!

Of course the argument is a little more complex than this but I ask you, do we really care anymore? Does justice make a difference if you have $36 billion in the bank? I very much doubt it and did anyone believe it ever did? At least it will be more difficult in the future for any technology giant to behave again as Microsoft did in the past without being called to account a great deal faster. And anyway, there’s Enron to worry about now.

The last ten years should have taught all of us a lesson. We had Windows and the Internet and the great Dot Com bubble, which burst, leaving many of the people I know out of pocket and wondering where their common sense had gone.

Like Dr Frankenstein, we created the Microsofts' of this world and then looked surprised, when the company used its considerable muscle to build the monopoly that gave us the software we demanded of it.

Now there’s no going back. There’s every sign that tomorrow will be an even more of a Microsoft world than today and like some latter-day Faustus that’ s the bargain we made when we threw out OS/2 in favour of a prettier looking and less reliable Windows. If Governments aren’t strong enough to stand in front of this runaway train we might as well get used to the idea of a software industry being divvied-up between a handful of well-known companies. It’s called commercial Darwinism I suppose.
After all, it’s no different to Kelloggs and the cornflake business. Winner takes all I’m afraid.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…